Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Am I reading something wrong or is Tempest fighter just better?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lord Sessadore" data-source="post: 4562334" data-attributes="member: 57255"><p>Something you missed: Scale (+7 AC) plus a heavy shield (+2 AC and Ref) gives the sword-and-board and axe-and-board fighters an AC of 19, as well as a Reflex defense +2 higher than the others. That puts them ahead as a pure defender, both because their AC is ahead (albiet only by 1 point), but neither TWD or the Defensive weapon property grants a bonus to Reflex. </p><p></p><p>However, to properly compare the expected damage of a double-weapon tempest fighter to the other kinds of fighters, remember that all double weapons require a feat. So instead of comparing the Double Axe** user to normal martial weapons, you need to compare it to superior weapons (and since we're using double weapons, I'm going to use other weapons from AV too). Giving you something more like this (each fighter spends 1 feat on a Weapon Proficiency):</p><p></p><p>Tempest fighter with two Katar*</p><p>AC: 17</p><p>Proficiency bonus: +3</p><p>Total attack bonus: +8</p><p>Damage: Range 7-12, Average 9.5</p><p>Chance to hit the example soldier: 60% hit + 5% crit</p><p>Expected Damage output: 5.7 + 0.775 = 6.475</p><p> </p><p>Fighter with Shield and Bastard Sword</p><p>AC: 19</p><p>Proficiency bonus: +3</p><p>Total attack bonus: +8</p><p>Damage: Range 5-14, Average 9.5</p><p>Chance to hit the example soldier: 60% hit + 5% crit</p><p>Expected damage output: 5.7 + 0.7 = 6.4</p><p> </p><p>Fighter with Waraxe and Shield</p><p>AC: 19</p><p>Proficiency bonus: +2</p><p>Total attack bonus: +7</p><p>Damage: Range 5-16 Average 10.5</p><p>Chance to hit the example soldier: 55% + 5% crit</p><p>Expected damage output: 5.775 + 0.8 = 6.575</p><p> </p><p>Fighter with Fullblade</p><p>AC: 17</p><p>Proficiency bonus: +3</p><p>Total attack bonus: +8</p><p>Damage: Range 5-16, Average 10.5</p><p>Chance to hit the example soldier: 60% hit + 5% crit</p><p>Expected damage output: 6.3 + 1.125 = 7.425</p><p> </p><p>Fighter with Mordenkrad (superior 2h hammer)</p><p>AC: 17</p><p>Proficiency bonus: +2</p><p>Total attack bonus: +7</p><p>Damage: Range 8-16, Average 12</p><p>Chance to hit the example soldier: 55% hit + 5% crit</p><p>Expected damage output: 6.6 + 0.8 = 7.4</p><p></p><p>Fighter with Execution Axe</p><p>AC: 17</p><p>Proficiency bonus: +2</p><p>Total attack bonus: +7</p><p>Damage: Range 7-16, Average 11.5</p><p>Chance to hit example soldier: 55% hit + 5% crit</p><p>Expected damage output: 6.325 + 1.175 = 7.5</p><p></p><p>Tempest fighter with Double Axe (off-hand side)**</p><p>AC 18</p><p>Proficiency bonus: +2</p><p>Total attack bonus: +7</p><p>Damage: Range 7-16, Average 11.5</p><p>Chance to hit the example soldier: 55% hit + 5% crit</p><p>Expected damage output: 6.325 + 0.8 = 7.125</p><p></p><p>*Katar was the best I could find as an upgrade to short swords. The kukri in AV is still 1d6 and brutal 1, but only +2 prof, so I felt katar was a better comparison. In any case, I don't think the tempest fighter has good options for superior, off-hand weapons - same expected damage as normal fighter with a bastard sword, just slightly higher crits.</p><p>**Read WotC_Logan's post just before I posted, so I switched the ugrosh to a double axe, using the off-hand side (since that is now the highest damage off-hand weapon).</p><p></p><p>So, with Wotc_Logan's recent clarification as to the intent of double weapons, we see that using a double weapon puts the tempest fighter using a double weapon somewhere between a normal sword-and-board fighter and a normal 2h fighter. I think that's fair, don't you?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lord Sessadore, post: 4562334, member: 57255"] Something you missed: Scale (+7 AC) plus a heavy shield (+2 AC and Ref) gives the sword-and-board and axe-and-board fighters an AC of 19, as well as a Reflex defense +2 higher than the others. That puts them ahead as a pure defender, both because their AC is ahead (albiet only by 1 point), but neither TWD or the Defensive weapon property grants a bonus to Reflex. However, to properly compare the expected damage of a double-weapon tempest fighter to the other kinds of fighters, remember that all double weapons require a feat. So instead of comparing the Double Axe** user to normal martial weapons, you need to compare it to superior weapons (and since we're using double weapons, I'm going to use other weapons from AV too). Giving you something more like this (each fighter spends 1 feat on a Weapon Proficiency): Tempest fighter with two Katar* AC: 17 Proficiency bonus: +3 Total attack bonus: +8 Damage: Range 7-12, Average 9.5 Chance to hit the example soldier: 60% hit + 5% crit Expected Damage output: 5.7 + 0.775 = 6.475 Fighter with Shield and Bastard Sword AC: 19 Proficiency bonus: +3 Total attack bonus: +8 Damage: Range 5-14, Average 9.5 Chance to hit the example soldier: 60% hit + 5% crit Expected damage output: 5.7 + 0.7 = 6.4 Fighter with Waraxe and Shield AC: 19 Proficiency bonus: +2 Total attack bonus: +7 Damage: Range 5-16 Average 10.5 Chance to hit the example soldier: 55% + 5% crit Expected damage output: 5.775 + 0.8 = 6.575 Fighter with Fullblade AC: 17 Proficiency bonus: +3 Total attack bonus: +8 Damage: Range 5-16, Average 10.5 Chance to hit the example soldier: 60% hit + 5% crit Expected damage output: 6.3 + 1.125 = 7.425 Fighter with Mordenkrad (superior 2h hammer) AC: 17 Proficiency bonus: +2 Total attack bonus: +7 Damage: Range 8-16, Average 12 Chance to hit the example soldier: 55% hit + 5% crit Expected damage output: 6.6 + 0.8 = 7.4 Fighter with Execution Axe AC: 17 Proficiency bonus: +2 Total attack bonus: +7 Damage: Range 7-16, Average 11.5 Chance to hit example soldier: 55% hit + 5% crit Expected damage output: 6.325 + 1.175 = 7.5 Tempest fighter with Double Axe (off-hand side)** AC 18 Proficiency bonus: +2 Total attack bonus: +7 Damage: Range 7-16, Average 11.5 Chance to hit the example soldier: 55% hit + 5% crit Expected damage output: 6.325 + 0.8 = 7.125 *Katar was the best I could find as an upgrade to short swords. The kukri in AV is still 1d6 and brutal 1, but only +2 prof, so I felt katar was a better comparison. In any case, I don't think the tempest fighter has good options for superior, off-hand weapons - same expected damage as normal fighter with a bastard sword, just slightly higher crits. **Read WotC_Logan's post just before I posted, so I switched the ugrosh to a double axe, using the off-hand side (since that is now the highest damage off-hand weapon). So, with Wotc_Logan's recent clarification as to the intent of double weapons, we see that using a double weapon puts the tempest fighter using a double weapon somewhere between a normal sword-and-board fighter and a normal 2h fighter. I think that's fair, don't you? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Am I reading something wrong or is Tempest fighter just better?
Top