Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="EyeontheMountain" data-source="post: 3250960" data-attributes="member: 32338">I certainly do agree thatthe feat could be clearer, but I do get offended by those who insist on  avoiding the intent of the ability(Which he FaQ generally does a good job of clarifying) to get into ridiculous interpretations.Via the FaQ it seems clear that the feat is mostly for sorcerors and others with a large spell list but few spells known. Duskblades can indeed use this feat, as hey do not know every spell on their lists.I don't really see a big problem with allowing a divine caster to take divine spells or an arcane caster to take arcane spells not on their lists with supervision from the DM. It isa whole feat, and in D&D feat are precious. In this case I would tend to disallow casters to take spells from limited spell lists like rangers/paladins and so on as their spells do not really follow the 1st, 2nd, etc level power of other full casting classes like wizards and clerics.However extending it out to allow divine casters to grab arcane spells and vice versa is jsut absurd, and to me falls directly under the heading of munchkinsim.</blockquote>