Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="underfoot007ct" data-source="post: 6001523" data-attributes="member: 93883">A truly excellent point, maybe if we allow the infantry extra shots with their weapon, &  carry a couple of extra ammo clips for free. Then maybe the F-22  could only fire the 20 mm cannon, and use their missiles, mach speeds, & stealth; each once per day.Missile bloat is a huge problem, we need to keep the number of missiles low. Also the tag 'air superiority fighter', 'fighter' sound to gamey, and 'superiority' sound to arbitrary. A much better name would be 'military craft  that can fly '. Why do we need missiles & jet engines, we have won wars without them in the past.  Jet engines are fiddly & wonky.Maybe we can have only a single air frame, then we can specialize them.  F-22 transport, F-22 light bomber F-22 Medium bomber, F-22 Heavy Bomber,  tanker, F-22 cargo, F-22 flying boat etc ...Oh, all new aircraft will have potted plants to be thrown to entangles other planes & & dinner plates to be thrown in the path of incoming cannon rounds. This will surely reward 'creative' pilots.</blockquote>