Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Am I the only one who doesn't like the arbitrary "boss monster" tag?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ahnehnois" data-source="post: 6002000" data-attributes="member: 17106"><p>XP has always been something that a lot of people ignored and that the rest of people tend to modify substantially (check the various ENW polls on the subject). XP is hardly a core D&D mechanic, nor is it a particularly successful or important one. Attack rolls are foundational to D&D's approach and are not really an appropriate comparison.</p><p></p><p>If they really assume that the average D&D group will use one XP system, the one in the book, they're in for a world of trouble.</p><p> </p><p>You did see the detailed response I wrote after that, right?</p><p> </p><p>I do have some experience with 2e; I just don't own any of the books. That being said, my perspective is my perspective. I don't know or care what D&D was before I was born (1985), and I'm pretty clear about that. You could say that perspective is limiting because I don't understand all of D&D's history, but it also brings something that ENW doesn't have a lot of: a younger voice. The average age on these boards is significantly older than me.</p><p></p><p>Many D&D players do not have experience with pre-WotC D&D. Virtually any new players recruited now don't have such experience. Conversely, almost all D&D players, new and old, have significant experience with 3.X in some sense, either as D&D or as PF, even if they went back to old school or now play 4e or a non-D&D rpg. It makes a lot of sense to use that as a point of reference.</p><p></p><p>Commonly, edition warriors have tried to posit 4e as the game for the 'cool kids', one that somehow attracts the youth that this hobby desperately needs. They have likewise tried to paint players of 3.5, PF, or various pre-WotC systems as old, cantankerous, inflexible, and unreasonable. They dismiss any number of mechanical issues on that basis, apparently believing that anything new is good, and anything older than 4e is obsolete. They're wrong, and they're killing the hobby. Thus, I feel it rather important to articulate the views of someone who is not old enough to remember old school D&D, let alone be nostalgic for it, who used to call the local WotC store the day the new splatbook arrived and liked the company and the brand, but nonetheless doesn't like WotC's recent creative and business decisions, not because they're new, not because I have some bias against them, but because they suck. I want 5e to be good. Not new, not old, good.</p><p></p><p>Like anyone, my opinion reflects only my experiences and perspective, but I try to say things that need to be said.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ahnehnois, post: 6002000, member: 17106"] XP has always been something that a lot of people ignored and that the rest of people tend to modify substantially (check the various ENW polls on the subject). XP is hardly a core D&D mechanic, nor is it a particularly successful or important one. Attack rolls are foundational to D&D's approach and are not really an appropriate comparison. If they really assume that the average D&D group will use one XP system, the one in the book, they're in for a world of trouble. You did see the detailed response I wrote after that, right? I do have some experience with 2e; I just don't own any of the books. That being said, my perspective is my perspective. I don't know or care what D&D was before I was born (1985), and I'm pretty clear about that. You could say that perspective is limiting because I don't understand all of D&D's history, but it also brings something that ENW doesn't have a lot of: a younger voice. The average age on these boards is significantly older than me. Many D&D players do not have experience with pre-WotC D&D. Virtually any new players recruited now don't have such experience. Conversely, almost all D&D players, new and old, have significant experience with 3.X in some sense, either as D&D or as PF, even if they went back to old school or now play 4e or a non-D&D rpg. It makes a lot of sense to use that as a point of reference. Commonly, edition warriors have tried to posit 4e as the game for the 'cool kids', one that somehow attracts the youth that this hobby desperately needs. They have likewise tried to paint players of 3.5, PF, or various pre-WotC systems as old, cantankerous, inflexible, and unreasonable. They dismiss any number of mechanical issues on that basis, apparently believing that anything new is good, and anything older than 4e is obsolete. They're wrong, and they're killing the hobby. Thus, I feel it rather important to articulate the views of someone who is not old enough to remember old school D&D, let alone be nostalgic for it, who used to call the local WotC store the day the new splatbook arrived and liked the company and the brand, but nonetheless doesn't like WotC's recent creative and business decisions, not because they're new, not because I have some bias against them, but because they suck. I want 5e to be good. Not new, not old, good. Like anyone, my opinion reflects only my experiences and perspective, but I try to say things that need to be said. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Am I the only one who doesn't like the arbitrary "boss monster" tag?
Top