Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Amethyst - New campaign setting
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dias Ex Machina" data-source="post: 4230288" data-attributes="member: 58907"><p>I think we all know that 4.0 will sell very well. That is not the issue. We are balancing what is best for the setting in comparison to what is best for the product. </p><p></p><p>To quote the post on our page...</p><p></p><p>By choosing D&D 4.0, we believe we are opting for a "shotgun" approach by jumping on the back of a very big train which could expand our circle of distribution. There is no refuting that a lot of people will be playing 4.0 very quickly and releasing Amethyst as 4.0 could net us higher sales, which would be translated to further books, quicker releases, and glossier final products. Alas 4.0 is more combat orientated with a special skew towards unrealistic heroic roles (given enough levels). The final result may involve more than a few sacrifices of the setting's feel as Amethyst has a story-based gaming foundation and D&D 4.0 appears more designed for continuous grinding combat. Amethyst was trying to be a more realistic fantasy and our real climb would be to attempt that within the 4.0 GSL's guidelines.</p><p></p><p>...and thanks for the comment and no, don't feel bad about not picking up the 3.5 version. We knew it was coming. Words cannot describe the feelings through our camp half-way through development when 4.0 got announced. With so little information on it, we decided to continue with the 3.5 edition and see how it ran. We had hoped to garner enough interest (and funds) to continue on with a new edition (regardless of which one that would be). Suffice to say, we were not expecting 4.0 to divide the community so much. Suddenly, moving onto 4.0 didn't appear like an obvious choice. When the rules began to be posted, a chill ran down our spines as we realized we may not be able to work with it. Like I said, it will depend a lot on the freedom the GSL.</p><p></p><p>On that, I WILL say that the 3.5 current version has certain attributes a future version (like 4.0) will lack. The story segments (amounting to nearly 20 pages of the 3.5 book) will be gone and some of our proudest achievments like our Paladin and Ranger prestige classes and our Focus Paths may not carry over. </p><p></p><p>Oh, and I can't wait to hear what you think of the book, Crothian.</p><p></p><p><img src="http://www.diasexmachina.com/Zoom3.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " data-size="" style="" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dias Ex Machina, post: 4230288, member: 58907"] I think we all know that 4.0 will sell very well. That is not the issue. We are balancing what is best for the setting in comparison to what is best for the product. To quote the post on our page... By choosing D&D 4.0, we believe we are opting for a "shotgun" approach by jumping on the back of a very big train which could expand our circle of distribution. There is no refuting that a lot of people will be playing 4.0 very quickly and releasing Amethyst as 4.0 could net us higher sales, which would be translated to further books, quicker releases, and glossier final products. Alas 4.0 is more combat orientated with a special skew towards unrealistic heroic roles (given enough levels). The final result may involve more than a few sacrifices of the setting's feel as Amethyst has a story-based gaming foundation and D&D 4.0 appears more designed for continuous grinding combat. Amethyst was trying to be a more realistic fantasy and our real climb would be to attempt that within the 4.0 GSL's guidelines. ...and thanks for the comment and no, don't feel bad about not picking up the 3.5 version. We knew it was coming. Words cannot describe the feelings through our camp half-way through development when 4.0 got announced. With so little information on it, we decided to continue with the 3.5 edition and see how it ran. We had hoped to garner enough interest (and funds) to continue on with a new edition (regardless of which one that would be). Suffice to say, we were not expecting 4.0 to divide the community so much. Suddenly, moving onto 4.0 didn't appear like an obvious choice. When the rules began to be posted, a chill ran down our spines as we realized we may not be able to work with it. Like I said, it will depend a lot on the freedom the GSL. On that, I WILL say that the 3.5 current version has certain attributes a future version (like 4.0) will lack. The story segments (amounting to nearly 20 pages of the 3.5 book) will be gone and some of our proudest achievments like our Paladin and Ranger prestige classes and our Focus Paths may not carry over. Oh, and I can't wait to hear what you think of the book, Crothian. [IMG]http://www.diasexmachina.com/Zoom3.jpg[/IMG] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Amethyst - New campaign setting
Top