Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Doc Eldritch" data-source="post: 5426992" data-attributes="member: 68817">Wow..this almost sounds like they are pulling back from an RPG market slowly, and wanting to focus more effort on related areas, such as boardgames tied to an RPG &quot;name&quot;.Perhaps a bit early to tell, but NOT a good sign and the article does not inspire hope.&nbsp; Feels like WotC is seriously dropping the ball here, though only time will tell for sure.&nbsp; I know that I personally, have little interest in individual articles and would rather see a compilation for Dragon/Dungeon.&nbsp; I mean, a magazine, by definition, is a compilation of articles!&nbsp; Not an individual article here and there under a brand name.The missing books are truly a shame, as they seemed more interesting that what was left on the lineup.&nbsp; And with no word as to WHY things were changed so suddenly, it leaves a lot of doubt as to what WotC intends for possible future books.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Doc Eldritch, post: 5426992, member: 68817"] Wow..this almost sounds like they are pulling back from an RPG market slowly, and wanting to focus more effort on related areas, such as boardgames tied to an RPG "name". Perhaps a bit early to tell, but NOT a good sign and the article does not inspire hope. Feels like WotC is seriously dropping the ball here, though only time will tell for sure. I know that I personally, have little interest in individual articles and would rather see a compilation for Dragon/Dungeon. I mean, a magazine, by definition, is a compilation of articles! Not an individual article here and there under a brand name. The missing books are truly a shame, as they seemed more interesting that what was left on the lineup. And with no word as to WHY things were changed so suddenly, it leaves a lot of doubt as to what WotC intends for possible future books. [/QUOTE]

Verification