Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Ampersand: Sneak Attack
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="heretic888" data-source="post: 4071817" data-attributes="member: 60326"><p>Hi Ahglock,</p><p></p><p>So, let me get this straight. You would rather increase the arithmetic players and DMs must utilize in any given round of combat to "make sense" of powerful special abilities?? Slowing down combat and making the game more complicated has more narrative power to you?? Seriously??</p><p></p><p>I personally find this mind-boggling. Reminds me of this one guy over on the WotC forums who couldn't "rationalize" the per-encounter maneuvers of <em>Tome of Battle</em> so he created this extremely complicated sub-system that essentially wedded maneuvers to the Combat Focus feats from the PHB2. I found the whole enterprise needlessly convoluted and complicated and it seemed as if it would not only slow down combat even more, but restrict the tactical options of martial adepts at the same time.</p><p></p><p>I mean, isn't it much easier to just flip a card over when you can't use that power any more?? Wouldn't the game run much faster and smoother that way??</p><p></p><p>In either case, I find your proposed solution runs into the same problem that the developers found with the "recharge" mechanic from ToB. Characters would just use their "best" or "strongest" power as many times as they could as often as they could until it stopped working. They would, essentially, do the same thing round after round after round until the target's AC got too high. Then, they'd just move on to the next target and start over. Rinse, wash, repeat.</p><p></p><p>This defeats the whole purpose of having these powers in the first place.</p><p></p><p>I really don't see the problem you guys are having with these encounter and daily powers. I could easily narrate them as a matter of tactical positioning and opportunity. I was in just the right position at just the right time at just the distance to use my rogue's Torturous Strike power. If you want to go even further, narrate it as your swiftblade's Penetrating Blade technique. Our plucky hero didn't use this power again during the encounter because those circumstances did not reproduce themselves for him to use that attack again.</p><p></p><p>Or, if you want, narrate it as a matter of perfect concentration and focus that can only be achieved once during any given fight. Or, a transitory burst of pure adrenaline to use a special technique. Or, channeling your animus and innate reserves into a mighty strike.</p><p></p><p>I mean, really. Its that simple. No need to pigeonhole people into any fixed metanarrative because, and this is the beauty of this mechanic, you the player are free to construct your own narrative that best explains how your character's individual powers work. Badda bing.</p><p></p><p>This requires nothing more than the ability to think abstractly (y'know, the way we *all* do when it comes to hit points, armor class, and turn-based combat rounds?). Not every minutia of the game needs a concrete mechanic or rule behind it. Use generalizatons. Use abstractions. They're fun. They promote storytelling and encourage immersion.</p><p></p><p>But.... nah.</p><p></p><p>Laterz.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="heretic888, post: 4071817, member: 60326"] Hi Ahglock, So, let me get this straight. You would rather increase the arithmetic players and DMs must utilize in any given round of combat to "make sense" of powerful special abilities?? Slowing down combat and making the game more complicated has more narrative power to you?? Seriously?? I personally find this mind-boggling. Reminds me of this one guy over on the WotC forums who couldn't "rationalize" the per-encounter maneuvers of [i]Tome of Battle[/i] so he created this extremely complicated sub-system that essentially wedded maneuvers to the Combat Focus feats from the PHB2. I found the whole enterprise needlessly convoluted and complicated and it seemed as if it would not only slow down combat even more, but restrict the tactical options of martial adepts at the same time. I mean, isn't it much easier to just flip a card over when you can't use that power any more?? Wouldn't the game run much faster and smoother that way?? In either case, I find your proposed solution runs into the same problem that the developers found with the "recharge" mechanic from ToB. Characters would just use their "best" or "strongest" power as many times as they could as often as they could until it stopped working. They would, essentially, do the same thing round after round after round until the target's AC got too high. Then, they'd just move on to the next target and start over. Rinse, wash, repeat. This defeats the whole purpose of having these powers in the first place. I really don't see the problem you guys are having with these encounter and daily powers. I could easily narrate them as a matter of tactical positioning and opportunity. I was in just the right position at just the right time at just the distance to use my rogue's Torturous Strike power. If you want to go even further, narrate it as your swiftblade's Penetrating Blade technique. Our plucky hero didn't use this power again during the encounter because those circumstances did not reproduce themselves for him to use that attack again. Or, if you want, narrate it as a matter of perfect concentration and focus that can only be achieved once during any given fight. Or, a transitory burst of pure adrenaline to use a special technique. Or, channeling your animus and innate reserves into a mighty strike. I mean, really. Its that simple. No need to pigeonhole people into any fixed metanarrative because, and this is the beauty of this mechanic, you the player are free to construct your own narrative that best explains how your character's individual powers work. Badda bing. This requires nothing more than the ability to think abstractly (y'know, the way we *all* do when it comes to hit points, armor class, and turn-based combat rounds?). Not every minutia of the game needs a concrete mechanic or rule behind it. Use generalizatons. Use abstractions. They're fun. They promote storytelling and encourage immersion. But.... nah. Laterz. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Ampersand: Sneak Attack
Top