Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Ampersand: Sneak Attack
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Greg K" data-source="post: 4072152" data-attributes="member: 5038"><p>I'm going to disagree. The way I see it, you could try to kick the guy in the pelvis twelve times in a row (or some other maneuver), but chose not to. Why? Probably, because of risks or other circumstances. Most likely, </p><p>a) You recognized the risk of your opponent catching on making him more likely to avoid your attack or worse come up with a counter that exploits your maneuver making you more vulnerable to their attack and/or placing you in a vulnerable position.</p><p></p><p>b) recognizing that while you might have access to the target area it was decreased by positioning or some other factor that would have decreased accuracy and you run the risk of being off target.</p><p> </p><p>c) positioning or distance make it impossible to make contact with the target area. You have no way to make contact with the area you want to target. You are just better off trying something else.</p><p></p><p>d) You have attacks that while not as damaging are more reliable.</p><p></p><p>Regardless of why you chose not to, there was nothing physically preventing you from trying the attack again. Both A&B might still succeed, but you weighed your options and chose something else, because repeating the attack sequentially just becomes less optimal. However, that doesn't mean that a good opening to reuse the maneuver can't present itself later whether at some random time (e.g., the opponent dropping their guard performing their own maneuver, being fatigued, or being "rocked) or because successfully created an opening using feints and combinations or trying to catch an opponent off guard by "throwing caution to the wind hoping" hoping to catch them flat-footed. Then, there is just being able to reliably reuse your maneuver, because you completely outclass your opponent in terms of combat skill. </p><p></p><p>Watching MMA's and professional fighting, you will see examples of fighters reusing maneuvers multiple times in a fight. San Shou fighting Champion, Coung Le and former multi-time kickboxing champion, Bill "Superfoot" Wallace are both good examples that come to mind right now. Coung Le routinely and successfully utilizes leg scissor takedowns and grapple/slams against his opponent. He may not utilize them in successive attacks, but he successfully utilizes these multiple times in a round let alone a fight, because he sets his opponent to place himself in position. As for "Superfoot", the guy earned his name, because he only had one good leg, but he could throw kicks at nearly 60mph and he could place those kicks with precision up, over or around his opponent's defenses. He would use a variety of combinations comprised of jab like kicks, hook kicks and roundhouse kicks using the same leg. With both fighters, their opponent's know the technique are going to be coming especially in the case of "Superfoot", but both fighters repeatedly use these maneuvers in an "encounter" and do so successfully.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Greg K, post: 4072152, member: 5038"] I'm going to disagree. The way I see it, you could try to kick the guy in the pelvis twelve times in a row (or some other maneuver), but chose not to. Why? Probably, because of risks or other circumstances. Most likely, a) You recognized the risk of your opponent catching on making him more likely to avoid your attack or worse come up with a counter that exploits your maneuver making you more vulnerable to their attack and/or placing you in a vulnerable position. b) recognizing that while you might have access to the target area it was decreased by positioning or some other factor that would have decreased accuracy and you run the risk of being off target. c) positioning or distance make it impossible to make contact with the target area. You have no way to make contact with the area you want to target. You are just better off trying something else. d) You have attacks that while not as damaging are more reliable. Regardless of why you chose not to, there was nothing physically preventing you from trying the attack again. Both A&B might still succeed, but you weighed your options and chose something else, because repeating the attack sequentially just becomes less optimal. However, that doesn't mean that a good opening to reuse the maneuver can't present itself later whether at some random time (e.g., the opponent dropping their guard performing their own maneuver, being fatigued, or being "rocked) or because successfully created an opening using feints and combinations or trying to catch an opponent off guard by "throwing caution to the wind hoping" hoping to catch them flat-footed. Then, there is just being able to reliably reuse your maneuver, because you completely outclass your opponent in terms of combat skill. Watching MMA's and professional fighting, you will see examples of fighters reusing maneuvers multiple times in a fight. San Shou fighting Champion, Coung Le and former multi-time kickboxing champion, Bill "Superfoot" Wallace are both good examples that come to mind right now. Coung Le routinely and successfully utilizes leg scissor takedowns and grapple/slams against his opponent. He may not utilize them in successive attacks, but he successfully utilizes these multiple times in a round let alone a fight, because he sets his opponent to place himself in position. As for "Superfoot", the guy earned his name, because he only had one good leg, but he could throw kicks at nearly 60mph and he could place those kicks with precision up, over or around his opponent's defenses. He would use a variety of combinations comprised of jab like kicks, hook kicks and roundhouse kicks using the same leg. With both fighters, their opponent's know the technique are going to be coming especially in the case of "Superfoot", but both fighters repeatedly use these maneuvers in an "encounter" and do so successfully. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Ampersand: Sneak Attack
Top