Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Ampersand: Sneak Attack
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Greg K" data-source="post: 4072635" data-attributes="member: 5038"><p>For most of those, I listed, I think requiring an action points is a horrible implementation. Then again, I prefer how maneuvers work in BOIM.</p><p></p><p></p><p>1. Negative conditions are built into the maneuvers. Bad positioning or exceptional accuracy is a to hit penalty or the opponent reflex save to avoid some extra effect. Putting one's self out of position or dropping one's guard is an ac penalty and/or opponent getting an AoO. This means, I need to consider when the character uses the maneuver and how often.</p><p></p><p>a. If I want my character to throw caution to the wind (e.g, either he is reckless or the situation is dire and the opponent needs to be dropped quickly), I can try a risky maneuver for a big payoff, I can do that repeatedly, but realize that that it is more likely to bite my characer in the backside via various possible penalties from attack penalties, ac penalties, or opportunity attacks.</p><p></p><p>b. I can take advantage of negative conditions on my chacter's opponent. If they are dazed, stunned, flat-footed, those are good moments to take advantage of their penalties. </p><p></p><p>c. I can have my opponent try to create openings to better utilize a maneuver by bluff/feint.</p><p></p><p></p><p>2. If an opponent uses a risky maneuver, my character can take advantage via penalties built into their maneuver .</p><p></p><p>3. If I determine that my character outclases my opponent in combat ability and defensive against their ac, I feel free to attempt my more powerful maneuvers more often.</p><p></p><p>and, unlike, per encounter, not once do I have the designers telling me that I can only use the maneuver once per encounter (or have to spend an action point for another use if this is what they are going to do). Instead, I have them telling me that I need to consider the consequences of using such actions and determine when it is most approriate to use them or create such situations when it is best to do so.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Greg K, post: 4072635, member: 5038"] For most of those, I listed, I think requiring an action points is a horrible implementation. Then again, I prefer how maneuvers work in BOIM. 1. Negative conditions are built into the maneuvers. Bad positioning or exceptional accuracy is a to hit penalty or the opponent reflex save to avoid some extra effect. Putting one's self out of position or dropping one's guard is an ac penalty and/or opponent getting an AoO. This means, I need to consider when the character uses the maneuver and how often. a. If I want my character to throw caution to the wind (e.g, either he is reckless or the situation is dire and the opponent needs to be dropped quickly), I can try a risky maneuver for a big payoff, I can do that repeatedly, but realize that that it is more likely to bite my characer in the backside via various possible penalties from attack penalties, ac penalties, or opportunity attacks. b. I can take advantage of negative conditions on my chacter's opponent. If they are dazed, stunned, flat-footed, those are good moments to take advantage of their penalties. c. I can have my opponent try to create openings to better utilize a maneuver by bluff/feint. 2. If an opponent uses a risky maneuver, my character can take advantage via penalties built into their maneuver . 3. If I determine that my character outclases my opponent in combat ability and defensive against their ac, I feel free to attempt my more powerful maneuvers more often. and, unlike, per encounter, not once do I have the designers telling me that I can only use the maneuver once per encounter (or have to spend an action point for another use if this is what they are going to do). Instead, I have them telling me that I need to consider the consequences of using such actions and determine when it is most approriate to use them or create such situations when it is best to do so. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Ampersand: Sneak Attack
Top