Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
An examination of player agency
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="chaochou" data-source="post: 9662408" data-attributes="member: 99817"><p>Hi [USER=42582]@pemerton[/USER]</p><p></p><p>Thanks for clarifying. Yes, I had misunderstood the direction of your previous post! And largely I agree with what you say.</p><p></p><p>So I think what you're describing is fleshing out what, in my formulation, is called the reliability of the rules. Or, more fully, the reliability of the rules to achieve your known goals.</p><p></p><p>I would describe the situation you present like this. The 'world' in an rpg is simply an imagined boardstate. It is a common feature of many rpgs that the only participant who is allowed to change the 'world' (ie the boardstate) is the GM. It is therefore self evident that any goals requiring a change in 'the world' can only be done by the GM - and so only the GM has agency to achieve them.</p><p></p><p>What happens in practice is that the sometimes the GM changes the boardstate in accordance with my wishes and then claims I exerted the agency. This is the heart of illusionism. Part of the same illusion is GMs who declare the boardstate independent of them, autonomous, with it's own causal and motive power. It's alive on its own. Utter nonsense when examined, and yet repeated again and again on these boards with complete seriousness. And the reason is to give GMs a fig leaf to pretend it isn't their agency changing the board.</p><p></p><p>Earlier, another poster asked why debates about agency are so frequent. My answer is because the predominant rpg playstyle is to give the GM all the agency, while denying that this is the case.</p><p></p><p>I played AD&D with friends (but no GM) and used the random dungeon generator and random encounter tables by dungeon level, random treasure tables. The game worked totally fine. We had reliable processes to generate what we needed. We could assess our ammo, spells, hit points and make judgements whether to move forward another room based on what we might encounter and what we might gain. All a GM would have done in this game is introduce unreliability into all these processes and overwritten our agency with their own!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="chaochou, post: 9662408, member: 99817"] Hi [USER=42582]@pemerton[/USER] Thanks for clarifying. Yes, I had misunderstood the direction of your previous post! And largely I agree with what you say. So I think what you're describing is fleshing out what, in my formulation, is called the reliability of the rules. Or, more fully, the reliability of the rules to achieve your known goals. I would describe the situation you present like this. The 'world' in an rpg is simply an imagined boardstate. It is a common feature of many rpgs that the only participant who is allowed to change the 'world' (ie the boardstate) is the GM. It is therefore self evident that any goals requiring a change in 'the world' can only be done by the GM - and so only the GM has agency to achieve them. What happens in practice is that the sometimes the GM changes the boardstate in accordance with my wishes and then claims I exerted the agency. This is the heart of illusionism. Part of the same illusion is GMs who declare the boardstate independent of them, autonomous, with it's own causal and motive power. It's alive on its own. Utter nonsense when examined, and yet repeated again and again on these boards with complete seriousness. And the reason is to give GMs a fig leaf to pretend it isn't their agency changing the board. Earlier, another poster asked why debates about agency are so frequent. My answer is because the predominant rpg playstyle is to give the GM all the agency, while denying that this is the case. I played AD&D with friends (but no GM) and used the random dungeon generator and random encounter tables by dungeon level, random treasure tables. The game worked totally fine. We had reliable processes to generate what we needed. We could assess our ammo, spells, hit points and make judgements whether to move forward another room based on what we might encounter and what we might gain. All a GM would have done in this game is introduce unreliability into all these processes and overwritten our agency with their own! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
An examination of player agency
Top