Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
An idea on feats and class abilities
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ComradeGnull" data-source="post: 5987325" data-attributes="member: 6685694"><p>I'd like to see guidance, rather than absolute restrictions (though, obviously, restrictions in the RAW could always be ignored). </p><p></p><p>In general, I think that it's too hard for new players or people who aren't mathematical min/maxers to separate feats and feat chains that are useful for their class from those that are traps either in absolute or relative terms- and the expansion of sourcebooks and splats only makes that worse.</p><p></p><p>At the very least, it would be good to see feats labelled or tagged, e.g.:</p><p>* 'Melee' for feats that might be useful for a defender, monk, swashbuckler, fighter, etc.</p><p>* 'Arcane caster' for feats that help wizards, sorcerers, etc.</p><p>* 'Low level' for feats that are primarily of interest to characters under level 10 (e.g., Toughness)</p><p>* 'High level' for non-level restricted feats that help characters above level 10 more than those below</p><p></p><p>What I'm not sure how to handle is how to convey to new players that feats like Eschew Materials are only useful if your DM decides to make them useful, and that you probably won't know that until you've been playing for some time, and that it will probably only be useful a handful of times unless your DM decides to be kind of an ass about it. Maybe they could just not make those feats?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ComradeGnull, post: 5987325, member: 6685694"] I'd like to see guidance, rather than absolute restrictions (though, obviously, restrictions in the RAW could always be ignored). In general, I think that it's too hard for new players or people who aren't mathematical min/maxers to separate feats and feat chains that are useful for their class from those that are traps either in absolute or relative terms- and the expansion of sourcebooks and splats only makes that worse. At the very least, it would be good to see feats labelled or tagged, e.g.: * 'Melee' for feats that might be useful for a defender, monk, swashbuckler, fighter, etc. * 'Arcane caster' for feats that help wizards, sorcerers, etc. * 'Low level' for feats that are primarily of interest to characters under level 10 (e.g., Toughness) * 'High level' for non-level restricted feats that help characters above level 10 more than those below What I'm not sure how to handle is how to convey to new players that feats like Eschew Materials are only useful if your DM decides to make them useful, and that you probably won't know that until you've been playing for some time, and that it will probably only be useful a handful of times unless your DM decides to be kind of an ass about it. Maybe they could just not make those feats? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
An idea on feats and class abilities
Top