Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
An idea on limiting high level spell casting
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Telsar" data-source="post: 3156896" data-attributes="member: 18837"><p>I'm going to be starting a new DnD 3.5 game with my face-to-face group sometime in the near future, and I'm trying to work on a HR that will limit high level spells.</p><p></p><p>Once games get into high levels, I start to lose interest because high-level spells dominate the combat. It all comes down to which side gets off their high-powered stuff first. One side devastates the others with empowered fireballs, or one side just teleports away when things get rough, sometimes immediately.</p><p></p><p>So I had an idea that I'd like advice on: limiting the casting of spells by what round of combat your in. During the first round, only 1st level spells could be used. Fireballs couldn't be introduced till round 3 (3rd level spell), and no one could Teleport away before round 5 (5th level).</p><p></p><p>I think I'd really like how this would change the dynamics of spell combat. The early rounds start off with the simplest effects, with more powerful and complex effects having to be delayed. I think it would simulate fiction better, where adversaries test out their foes with low level stuff before bringing in the heavy guns.</p><p></p><p>But... what would be the justification for it? Perhaps casters have to summon up the mental resources before using their high-level spells. But then you have to worry about ambushes; if one side can "power up", so to speak, just while sneakily watching their foes, then when the battle begins, the attackers have access to the high level stuff, while the defenders are stuck with low spells in the beginning. I don't like that. But I can't think of a reason why they couldn't do it that would make sense.</p><p></p><p>There's also the question of magic items; do you have to delay before you can use a wand of fireballs? If not, wands will get a lot more use. What about spell-like abilities, should they be limited by their level?</p><p></p><p>Any thoughts on how to make my idea work will be appreciated. Thoughts on other/better ways to nerf high-level casting will be appreciated too.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Telsar, post: 3156896, member: 18837"] I'm going to be starting a new DnD 3.5 game with my face-to-face group sometime in the near future, and I'm trying to work on a HR that will limit high level spells. Once games get into high levels, I start to lose interest because high-level spells dominate the combat. It all comes down to which side gets off their high-powered stuff first. One side devastates the others with empowered fireballs, or one side just teleports away when things get rough, sometimes immediately. So I had an idea that I'd like advice on: limiting the casting of spells by what round of combat your in. During the first round, only 1st level spells could be used. Fireballs couldn't be introduced till round 3 (3rd level spell), and no one could Teleport away before round 5 (5th level). I think I'd really like how this would change the dynamics of spell combat. The early rounds start off with the simplest effects, with more powerful and complex effects having to be delayed. I think it would simulate fiction better, where adversaries test out their foes with low level stuff before bringing in the heavy guns. But... what would be the justification for it? Perhaps casters have to summon up the mental resources before using their high-level spells. But then you have to worry about ambushes; if one side can "power up", so to speak, just while sneakily watching their foes, then when the battle begins, the attackers have access to the high level stuff, while the defenders are stuck with low spells in the beginning. I don't like that. But I can't think of a reason why they couldn't do it that would make sense. There's also the question of magic items; do you have to delay before you can use a wand of fireballs? If not, wands will get a lot more use. What about spell-like abilities, should they be limited by their level? Any thoughts on how to make my idea work will be appreciated. Thoughts on other/better ways to nerf high-level casting will be appreciated too. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
An idea on limiting high level spell casting
Top