Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="EzekielRaiden" data-source="post: 8773661" data-attributes="member: 6790260">I mean...the examples I illustrated with the above stuff were meant to indicate a world where a moderated polarity is good, productive, even necessary, while an absolute and uncompromising polarity is dangerous. It's not evil, it's just harmful to anything other than itself, because it is so focused.You might as well say that the sun has only three alignments: evil light, neutral good, evil dark. Evil light destroys with its radiation and solar wind and plasma storms. Evil dark destroys with frigid death and cosmic rays and impact events. Only the Goldilocks Zone can claim to be good.Or, to put it differently: I wasn't trying to define anything at all regarding good vs evil. I was exclusively looking at law vs chaos and how you can have immoderate, moderate, and neutral stances. Moderation is generally more favorable to existence than immoderation; being absolute, that is, having no moderation whatsoever, is generally inimical to life as we understand it.</blockquote>