Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
An Odd Thought Occured to Me about RPG's.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="clip" data-source="post: 5325906" data-attributes="member: 85760"><p>Actually, I think this is a much bigger deal in 4e. One of the things I have noticed about 4e is that it is played much much closer to the RAW than any previous edition - possibly due to the technical "wargame" like nature of the combat rules.</p><p></p><p>Due to this, what was fair game - nay, encouraged - in previous editions is now a "bad" thing in 4e. Editions 1-3 were for a variety of different reasons very messy, and essentially the DMs picked up the pieces. I daresay no-one played 1e or 2e RAW, and only the advent of 3.5e got players used to the idea of the rules being close to the stone tablets.</p><p></p><p>Today, however, the term "houserule" is almost a dirty word. Maybe its the technology, maybe its the game system - but in days of yore, there was no concept of houserules as such, they were assumed to be in place - your game was simply your game and it bore the same name as what was written on the cover, and had a passing resemblance to all other games of D&D. Now, players and referees feel compelled to play the RAW (and again, because of the technology and errata-ing) get concerned with the tiniest imbalances in game mechanics. It's a very big deal now if an encounter changes because a referee rules against RAW, or a player misinterprets a power card. Back in the day, the rules were drafted so badly, that it was a given that these things would occur constantly.</p><p></p><p>Back to Chris Perkins and Robot Chicken - this is more a sign of the times. Official forums are all about the RAW - character optimisation, certainly is all about being 100% solid on the rules. Look at retro-forums, though - like DF - there is a genuine pride about bending, breaking and rewriting all the rules at-will or on the fly. So to see a (very official) referee taking a snap decision gives fuel to the fire of the malcontents who on the one hand want WotC to be the great Satan, but on the other hand want to see their gameset rules followed to the letter.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="clip, post: 5325906, member: 85760"] Actually, I think this is a much bigger deal in 4e. One of the things I have noticed about 4e is that it is played much much closer to the RAW than any previous edition - possibly due to the technical "wargame" like nature of the combat rules. Due to this, what was fair game - nay, encouraged - in previous editions is now a "bad" thing in 4e. Editions 1-3 were for a variety of different reasons very messy, and essentially the DMs picked up the pieces. I daresay no-one played 1e or 2e RAW, and only the advent of 3.5e got players used to the idea of the rules being close to the stone tablets. Today, however, the term "houserule" is almost a dirty word. Maybe its the technology, maybe its the game system - but in days of yore, there was no concept of houserules as such, they were assumed to be in place - your game was simply your game and it bore the same name as what was written on the cover, and had a passing resemblance to all other games of D&D. Now, players and referees feel compelled to play the RAW (and again, because of the technology and errata-ing) get concerned with the tiniest imbalances in game mechanics. It's a very big deal now if an encounter changes because a referee rules against RAW, or a player misinterprets a power card. Back in the day, the rules were drafted so badly, that it was a given that these things would occur constantly. Back to Chris Perkins and Robot Chicken - this is more a sign of the times. Official forums are all about the RAW - character optimisation, certainly is all about being 100% solid on the rules. Look at retro-forums, though - like DF - there is a genuine pride about bending, breaking and rewriting all the rules at-will or on the fly. So to see a (very official) referee taking a snap decision gives fuel to the fire of the malcontents who on the one hand want WotC to be the great Satan, but on the other hand want to see their gameset rules followed to the letter. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
An Odd Thought Occured to Me about RPG's.
Top