Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
An Ontology of D&D Alignment
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Big J Money" data-source="post: 7866192" data-attributes="member: 70533"><p>Over the years, I’ve continued to be surprised that neither TSR nor WotC made an effort to educate in any depth the ways one can play with alignment in D&D.</p><p></p><p>In an effort to understand it more deeply, I’ve written this tool to break down and identify the meaningful characteristics of a given implementation of alignment (“alignment system”). You could apply this to the alignment that you use in your own D&D campaigns, those used by other DMs, or one which a given player uses for their character. Usually we’re not aware of these characteristics; they are not often deliberately identified or chosen. But, by learning about them one may become more aware of the possible implications, interactions and even compare and contrast different perspectives on D&D alignment using (somewhat) measurable criteria. My hope is to inspire at least one person to consider engaging with D&D’s alignment when maybe before you thought it was a pointless exercise.</p><p></p><p>I don’t claim to be an expert. I’m just another DM or player like yourself. There is no TLDR for this article. If you don’t enjoy analysis, you may wish to skip.</p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px"><strong>Features of Alignment</strong></span></p><p>These are ten properties which determine the form and behavior a given alignment system exhibits; I have broken them up, below. There is also a final section on actual interpretations of the alignments themselves.</p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 18px"><strong>I. Objectivity</strong></span></p><p>Is there one true and Objective answer for every question about Alignment in your campaign, or is there Subjectivity? An objective alignment is a ground truth for your setting. Alignment is explicitly defined, and every situation can be adjudicated by the DM according to a ruling. A purely subjective alignment cannot be measured or judged. The individual character decides whether they are acting according to a stated alignment or not and there is no correct or incorrect interpretation.</p><p></p><p>To have a fully subjective alignment system is practically equivalent to not having an alignment system, and none of these other alignment features have any meaning when alignment is wholly subjective.</p><p></p><p>This feature can be binary, or it can have a scalar (partial) characteristic by way of a threshold. A DM might rate actions to be "inconsequential" and treat them subjectively until a threshold is crossed by “very strong” action, at which point the treatment becomes objective.</p><p></p><p>Example: A Lawful Good character steals food to avoid starvation. </p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">In a fully <strong>objective </strong>alignment system, the DM will delineate which alignment this action falls under (ex. he may declare it chaotic).</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">In a fully <strong>subjective </strong>alignment system, the DM does not declare this to align to anything, allowing the player of the character doing the stealing to determine what alignment the action falls under.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">In a <strong>partially </strong>objective alignment system, the DM may not care about this action because it falls under the threshold of things that are to be treated subjectively; but if the same character kills an innocent, then the DM may declare that action to be evil and/or chaotic because it crosses an established threshold of “very” evil and/or chaotic.</li> </ul><p>N.B.1: In an objective alignment, one need not predetermine everything up front, but can adjudicate on demand, developing the alignment on the fly.</p><p></p><p>N.B.2: It could be interesting to have give the Good alignment a high threshold for objectively good actions, giving PCs a chance to measurably increase their goodness and attain sainthood, if they dare try. In such a world, it would be easy to fall from grace and hard to find redemption.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Big J Money, post: 7866192, member: 70533"] Over the years, I’ve continued to be surprised that neither TSR nor WotC made an effort to educate in any depth the ways one can play with alignment in D&D. In an effort to understand it more deeply, I’ve written this tool to break down and identify the meaningful characteristics of a given implementation of alignment (“alignment system”). You could apply this to the alignment that you use in your own D&D campaigns, those used by other DMs, or one which a given player uses for their character. Usually we’re not aware of these characteristics; they are not often deliberately identified or chosen. But, by learning about them one may become more aware of the possible implications, interactions and even compare and contrast different perspectives on D&D alignment using (somewhat) measurable criteria. My hope is to inspire at least one person to consider engaging with D&D’s alignment when maybe before you thought it was a pointless exercise. I don’t claim to be an expert. I’m just another DM or player like yourself. There is no TLDR for this article. If you don’t enjoy analysis, you may wish to skip. [SIZE=7][B]Features of Alignment[/B][/SIZE] These are ten properties which determine the form and behavior a given alignment system exhibits; I have broken them up, below. There is also a final section on actual interpretations of the alignments themselves. [SIZE=5][B]I. Objectivity[/B][/SIZE] Is there one true and Objective answer for every question about Alignment in your campaign, or is there Subjectivity? An objective alignment is a ground truth for your setting. Alignment is explicitly defined, and every situation can be adjudicated by the DM according to a ruling. A purely subjective alignment cannot be measured or judged. The individual character decides whether they are acting according to a stated alignment or not and there is no correct or incorrect interpretation. To have a fully subjective alignment system is practically equivalent to not having an alignment system, and none of these other alignment features have any meaning when alignment is wholly subjective. This feature can be binary, or it can have a scalar (partial) characteristic by way of a threshold. A DM might rate actions to be "inconsequential" and treat them subjectively until a threshold is crossed by “very strong” action, at which point the treatment becomes objective. Example: A Lawful Good character steals food to avoid starvation. [LIST] [*]In a fully [B]objective [/B]alignment system, the DM will delineate which alignment this action falls under (ex. he may declare it chaotic). [*]In a fully [B]subjective [/B]alignment system, the DM does not declare this to align to anything, allowing the player of the character doing the stealing to determine what alignment the action falls under. [*]In a [B]partially [/B]objective alignment system, the DM may not care about this action because it falls under the threshold of things that are to be treated subjectively; but if the same character kills an innocent, then the DM may declare that action to be evil and/or chaotic because it crosses an established threshold of “very” evil and/or chaotic. [/LIST] N.B.1: In an objective alignment, one need not predetermine everything up front, but can adjudicate on demand, developing the alignment on the fly. N.B.2: It could be interesting to have give the Good alignment a high threshold for objectively good actions, giving PCs a chance to measurably increase their goodness and attain sainthood, if they dare try. In such a world, it would be easy to fall from grace and hard to find redemption. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
An Ontology of D&D Alignment
Top