Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
An open letter to DnDInsider
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mustrum_Ridcully" data-source="post: 4169163" data-attributes="member: 710"><p>I don't know. This is the 4E D&D forum, so White Wolfs policy is only interesting if they put out 4E material. Who is to say anyone liked their policy, either. But if I wanted to complain on it, maybe a White Wolf board or a White Wolf-related board might be a better place.</p><p></p><p>More generally, just because next to everyone in the business does something you don't like, doesn't mean you are not allowed to like it, or complain about it. You might as well say that, just because most politicians tell half-truth or outright lies, I can't complain that a specific politician does it, too. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Personally, while I liked to know more, and earlier, I don't think WotC information or marketing is bad. People might not get it, but all the looking for tiny scoops and analyzing the little we have IS marketing. It's probably a kind of viral marketing (I am not a marketing expert, so there might be a different name.). </p><p>And as annoying as this kind of marketing sometimes can be, the truth is, we are still here, we have invested a lot of time in 4E, and this means (for the most part) that we will buy the books. And WotC didn't really have to do that much for this (in terms of marketing - that they had to create a possibly kick-ass game is another matter. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> )</p><p>This managed to keep our suspense for several months, with a modest amount of investment on WotC. </p><p>Now that the books are out to the printers, the release being very soon, the marketing changes tactics, becomes more aggressive (and more expensive for WotC). They release more information online, contact the press to facilitate interviews or news articles regarding to D&D and so on. (The latter is a mere guess, but considering this month I have seent he first D&D 4E related news articles - gathered by fellow EnWorlders - I suspect that this is also a marketing activity). They expand the base of people that hear of 4E and get interested in it. And now, the WotC and the ENWorld boards "are ready" for anyone surfing the net demanding to know more. </p><p>Heck, the Raiders of the Oakhurst adventure, the PHB lite, a 7+ page thread of custom 4E monsters, dozens of inofficial/private playtest reports, all this is stuff that someone now reached by the expanded marketing will have access to. Well organized and thoroughly analyzed by other gamers. And WotC didn't spend money or manpower on it!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mustrum_Ridcully, post: 4169163, member: 710"] I don't know. This is the 4E D&D forum, so White Wolfs policy is only interesting if they put out 4E material. Who is to say anyone liked their policy, either. But if I wanted to complain on it, maybe a White Wolf board or a White Wolf-related board might be a better place. More generally, just because next to everyone in the business does something you don't like, doesn't mean you are not allowed to like it, or complain about it. You might as well say that, just because most politicians tell half-truth or outright lies, I can't complain that a specific politician does it, too. Personally, while I liked to know more, and earlier, I don't think WotC information or marketing is bad. People might not get it, but all the looking for tiny scoops and analyzing the little we have IS marketing. It's probably a kind of viral marketing (I am not a marketing expert, so there might be a different name.). And as annoying as this kind of marketing sometimes can be, the truth is, we are still here, we have invested a lot of time in 4E, and this means (for the most part) that we will buy the books. And WotC didn't really have to do that much for this (in terms of marketing - that they had to create a possibly kick-ass game is another matter. :) ) This managed to keep our suspense for several months, with a modest amount of investment on WotC. Now that the books are out to the printers, the release being very soon, the marketing changes tactics, becomes more aggressive (and more expensive for WotC). They release more information online, contact the press to facilitate interviews or news articles regarding to D&D and so on. (The latter is a mere guess, but considering this month I have seent he first D&D 4E related news articles - gathered by fellow EnWorlders - I suspect that this is also a marketing activity). They expand the base of people that hear of 4E and get interested in it. And now, the WotC and the ENWorld boards "are ready" for anyone surfing the net demanding to know more. Heck, the Raiders of the Oakhurst adventure, the PHB lite, a 7+ page thread of custom 4E monsters, dozens of inofficial/private playtest reports, all this is stuff that someone now reached by the expanded marketing will have access to. Well organized and thoroughly analyzed by other gamers. And WotC didn't spend money or manpower on it! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
An open letter to DnDInsider
Top