Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Mouseferatu" data-source="post: 1395858" data-attributes="member: 1288">I suppose I should take half a mo' to jump in and qualify my position.I really don't have a problem with settings advancing or evolving. Nothing makes a setting stagnant faster than--well, stagnating. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D"  data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" />That said...When it comes to conversions of material that is not available under the current system, I would prefer that the old setting first be made available as it was (other than the obvious changes required by the differences and greater options inherent in the new system), and only then should it be advanced/evolved in new (and therefore, by definition, optional) supplements.Again, I understand that such a step-by-step process is a lot of work. I don't expect that of volunteers like those behind Planewalker, and this is in no way meant as a criticism of what PW has done. I mention it simply to explain my own personal stance on the matter, and why PW isn't what I'm looking for right now.</blockquote>