Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="El Mahdi" data-source="post: 4455443" data-attributes="member: 59506">Sorry, but not true, and here's the proof: I run a strictly houseruled 3.5E game, I'm not switching to 4E, yet I do want, read, and use info from the current Dungeon and Dragon magazines. I can get inspiration from material written with any system, especially adventures. I do own the 4E core books, which I have mined for ideas for my games, and may, based on the product, buy future 4E products. System of choice, for me, has very little to do with it. The adventure I'm running my group through at this moment is The Object of Desire, an AD&D 2E adventure from Dungeon issue #50. Before that was an Ed Greenwood tournament adventure called Thaldigars Tower, for either 1E or 2E (not sure). I've used Alternity adventures for D20 Future games as well as Star Wars adventures that I adapted (taking out some of the Star Wars flavor to make them work for my D20 Future Star*Drive game). I used all of these adventures in either D20 Modern/Future or in houseruled 3.5E games. My issues with Dungeon magazine are completely non-system dependent. I'm always looking for new and good adventures, regardless of system. What this is about, for me and other people on here, is if WoTC doesn't want to address the critiques and feedback of me and other WoTC fans/customers, then they don't deserve us as customers.</blockquote>