Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
An "open letter" to WotC staff on survey design
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="kevtar" data-source="post: 5869655" data-attributes="member: 27098"><p>This is an interesting point and something that a researcher should consider when designing the instrument. This is where we think about the sample: who do we want to participate? How do we get them to participate? What are the limitations in selecting our sample?, etc...</p><p></p><p>If we adopt the "maximized purposeful sampling" approach, we can argue that we are specifically targeting visitors to the WotC website that seek out the articles. We can make certain assumptions about the group, and if we were interested in publishing our results we would have a robust discussion about the characteristics of the sample and our justification for using this type of sample selection. I don't think that WotC is worried about those factors, but it is interesting to think about who decides to participate in those surveys and why. I believe that line of questioning is directly related to the purpose of the surveys. It seems logical that people who participate in the surveys do so because they want their voices "heard," and more specifically, they want their voices heard and considered in the development of the new edition of D&D. With that in mind, I think WotC should be more specific in what the purpose of the surveys are, and if they are for decision making that affects the game, how these data are analyzed, interpreted and how the recommendations are put forward.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="kevtar, post: 5869655, member: 27098"] This is an interesting point and something that a researcher should consider when designing the instrument. This is where we think about the sample: who do we want to participate? How do we get them to participate? What are the limitations in selecting our sample?, etc... If we adopt the "maximized purposeful sampling" approach, we can argue that we are specifically targeting visitors to the WotC website that seek out the articles. We can make certain assumptions about the group, and if we were interested in publishing our results we would have a robust discussion about the characteristics of the sample and our justification for using this type of sample selection. I don't think that WotC is worried about those factors, but it is interesting to think about who decides to participate in those surveys and why. I believe that line of questioning is directly related to the purpose of the surveys. It seems logical that people who participate in the surveys do so because they want their voices "heard," and more specifically, they want their voices heard and considered in the development of the new edition of D&D. With that in mind, I think WotC should be more specific in what the purpose of the surveys are, and if they are for decision making that affects the game, how these data are analyzed, interpreted and how the recommendations are put forward. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
An "open letter" to WotC staff on survey design
Top