Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
An "open letter" to WotC staff on survey design
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Greg K" data-source="post: 5869696" data-attributes="member: 5038"><p>I conduct market research interviews. I see good surveys and a lot of bad surveys written by the clients (e.g., ambiguous questions, leading questions, lack of basic skip patterns or don't provide a choice for don't know/refused locking up the survey when customers cannot is unable to provide an answer based on the choices provided). </p><p></p><p>I have had the opportunity to take several of WOTC's customer surveys and the majority have fallen into the bad survey category (there have been a few that were good).</p><p></p><p>I remember a survey about one of their products (don't recall which one). It asked me to rate the overall book. It asked me to rate specific sections. It asked me to rate certain content in the book and to rate that content on how much I wanted to see more. All of the questions were phrased to encourage me to rate things highly (which was annoying).</p><p>I rated the overall book poor to below average. I rated the sections and content asked about poor to mediocre and I had no desire to see any of the content inquired about in any future products. I never got to rate the few things that I felt were exceptional and of which I wanted to see more, because that was the specific content never addressed in the survey.</p><p></p><p>I had another survey in which I answered a question that should have led to a skip pattern to avoid a few questions. Instead, I was stuck with questions that I could not answer as I had no familiarity with the product in that section as answered in a previous section.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Greg K, post: 5869696, member: 5038"] I conduct market research interviews. I see good surveys and a lot of bad surveys written by the clients (e.g., ambiguous questions, leading questions, lack of basic skip patterns or don't provide a choice for don't know/refused locking up the survey when customers cannot is unable to provide an answer based on the choices provided). I have had the opportunity to take several of WOTC's customer surveys and the majority have fallen into the bad survey category (there have been a few that were good). I remember a survey about one of their products (don't recall which one). It asked me to rate the overall book. It asked me to rate specific sections. It asked me to rate certain content in the book and to rate that content on how much I wanted to see more. All of the questions were phrased to encourage me to rate things highly (which was annoying). I rated the overall book poor to below average. I rated the sections and content asked about poor to mediocre and I had no desire to see any of the content inquired about in any future products. I never got to rate the few things that I felt were exceptional and of which I wanted to see more, because that was the specific content never addressed in the survey. I had another survey in which I answered a question that should have led to a skip pattern to avoid a few questions. Instead, I was stuck with questions that I could not answer as I had no familiarity with the product in that section as answered in a previous section. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
An "open letter" to WotC staff on survey design
Top