Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Older Editions
An Optimistic View of 4E
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Cadfan" data-source="post: 3811262" data-attributes="member: 40961"><p>For me,</p><p></p><p>1) Cleaner monsters, with a focus on finding one cool theme per monster, and implementing it as well as possible with as few rules as possible.</p><p>2) Melee characters with flavor and variety to their attacks instead of just rolling to hit. I know you can always describe your attack with flavor, but when you attack 3 times per round and you fight two dozen rounds of combat per session, coming up with something cool each time is tough. Eventually you lapse into just rolling to hit.</p><p>3) Cleaning up the neglected parts of D&D that are technically in the rules but which most players ignore because they're annoying and don't do much. Like rules for switching between a cleric's shield, mace, and holy symbol.</p><p>4) Enlarging the sweet spot.</p><p>5) Making wizards and spellcasters more flavorful, instead of having your generic one size fits all wizard be the king of the casters.</p><p>6) Balancing magic so that a spellcaster can cast spells instead of fight in melee or sit around, while also preventing the nova/sleep effect.</p><p>7) Angering grognards.</p><p></p><p>And supporting points,</p><p></p><p>1) I don't know for sure how much of this will really happen. Some things, like making the sweet spot cover all 30 levels, there's no way to know until we get a chance to play. But the fact that the designers seem to recognize that there was a problem and to speak intelligently on why the problem existed makes me more confident that they can come up with a way to fix it.</p><p>2) Angering grognards isn't automatically a good thing, but sometimes they really annoy me. I like that D&D has changed with the times. Younger players have different fantasy heroes, and want to play characters that match them. This is a good thing, even if that hero was designed in Japan. The game should be as encompassing as possible. And honestly, if a player brings a character illustration of his barbarian to the game, and he's drawn a guy with big eyes, a small mouth, and a greatsword taller than he is, your game won't explode. Let him have his fun.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Cadfan, post: 3811262, member: 40961"] For me, 1) Cleaner monsters, with a focus on finding one cool theme per monster, and implementing it as well as possible with as few rules as possible. 2) Melee characters with flavor and variety to their attacks instead of just rolling to hit. I know you can always describe your attack with flavor, but when you attack 3 times per round and you fight two dozen rounds of combat per session, coming up with something cool each time is tough. Eventually you lapse into just rolling to hit. 3) Cleaning up the neglected parts of D&D that are technically in the rules but which most players ignore because they're annoying and don't do much. Like rules for switching between a cleric's shield, mace, and holy symbol. 4) Enlarging the sweet spot. 5) Making wizards and spellcasters more flavorful, instead of having your generic one size fits all wizard be the king of the casters. 6) Balancing magic so that a spellcaster can cast spells instead of fight in melee or sit around, while also preventing the nova/sleep effect. 7) Angering grognards. And supporting points, 1) I don't know for sure how much of this will really happen. Some things, like making the sweet spot cover all 30 levels, there's no way to know until we get a chance to play. But the fact that the designers seem to recognize that there was a problem and to speak intelligently on why the problem existed makes me more confident that they can come up with a way to fix it. 2) Angering grognards isn't automatically a good thing, but sometimes they really annoy me. I like that D&D has changed with the times. Younger players have different fantasy heroes, and want to play characters that match them. This is a good thing, even if that hero was designed in Japan. The game should be as encompassing as possible. And honestly, if a player brings a character illustration of his barbarian to the game, and he's drawn a guy with big eyes, a small mouth, and a greatsword taller than he is, your game won't explode. Let him have his fun. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Older Editions
An Optimistic View of 4E
Top