Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
anatomy question....
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="takyris" data-source="post: 3734305" data-attributes="member: 5171"><p>It might allow more fine manipulation with different types of grips. Like, if you're trying to reach into a tight spot to put a screw into a slot (no dirty minds, I'm thinking of furniture construction or the like), sometimes you have to either strain or switch to the opposite hand to get the right angle. Part of that strain is the lack of leverage and fine manipulation capability from that angle. With the thumb, you wouldn't have to switch hands.</p><p></p><p>My guess would be that tool usage would have ramped up considerably early on, since my understanding is that early development in tool using is a trial and error affair -- and there'd be fewer errors before a success if you had two different ways that were BOTH the right way to hold a tool. I don't know that we'd be any further along, but I suspect we'd have reached our current tech level a bit faster -- an accelerated development cycle very early in tech development, which then becomes more normal once the thumb is no longer the limiting factor (and things like material supply are).</p><p></p><p>If a double thumb actually helps the grip, evolving primates might not have left the "young clings to the mother/father" system, which would mean that modern man would have more hair.</p><p></p><p>People have brought up typing, but to extrapolate further back, I can imagine that with only 6 normal fingers and 4 thumbs, writing itself may have changed. For early cuneiform, the ideal structure might not have been flat tablets but cylinders that let the author write on both sides. Fast-forward a few thousand years, and modern keyboards might look like cylinders with keys all along the outside -- a lot of keys along the front, where the 6 fingers will type, and several important keys along the back, where the 4 thumbs type.</p><p></p><p>And factoring THAT in, writing would have been a ton more expensive to transport, until someone thought of having cylindrical pieces of wood or stone around which pieces of paper were fastened for early writing.</p><p></p><p>But I'm ranging pretty far afield. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="takyris, post: 3734305, member: 5171"] It might allow more fine manipulation with different types of grips. Like, if you're trying to reach into a tight spot to put a screw into a slot (no dirty minds, I'm thinking of furniture construction or the like), sometimes you have to either strain or switch to the opposite hand to get the right angle. Part of that strain is the lack of leverage and fine manipulation capability from that angle. With the thumb, you wouldn't have to switch hands. My guess would be that tool usage would have ramped up considerably early on, since my understanding is that early development in tool using is a trial and error affair -- and there'd be fewer errors before a success if you had two different ways that were BOTH the right way to hold a tool. I don't know that we'd be any further along, but I suspect we'd have reached our current tech level a bit faster -- an accelerated development cycle very early in tech development, which then becomes more normal once the thumb is no longer the limiting factor (and things like material supply are). If a double thumb actually helps the grip, evolving primates might not have left the "young clings to the mother/father" system, which would mean that modern man would have more hair. People have brought up typing, but to extrapolate further back, I can imagine that with only 6 normal fingers and 4 thumbs, writing itself may have changed. For early cuneiform, the ideal structure might not have been flat tablets but cylinders that let the author write on both sides. Fast-forward a few thousand years, and modern keyboards might look like cylinders with keys all along the outside -- a lot of keys along the front, where the 6 fingers will type, and several important keys along the back, where the 4 thumbs type. And factoring THAT in, writing would have been a ton more expensive to transport, until someone thought of having cylindrical pieces of wood or stone around which pieces of paper were fastened for early writing. But I'm ranging pretty far afield. :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
anatomy question....
Top