Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Ancients Behaving Badly
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="StreamOfTheSky" data-source="post: 4997786" data-attributes="member: 35909"><p>They try...</p><p></p><p>First off, they have a scale that they use for the grading. All the typical things you would consider evil work against (or for?) the person, while they also try to find redeeming qualities or historical bias. In Attila's case, redeeming qualities included being a caring family man apprently, and historical bias in the sense that only Romans -- his sworn enemy -- have written contemporary accounts of him, so it is quite reasonable to question if he was given fair treatment.</p><p></p><p>They also have a separate metric called "creativity." Without definition, I thought creativity in the sense of "new and uniquely cruel actions done," but they defined it as what the person created, legacy left behind, etc... Since Attila left...nothing, that probably hurt his score a lot. The show may have been most harsh on his impaling of traitors and a few cases where he massacred innocent women and children. I don't think that's terribly fair for as you said, the historical context. Romans killed innocent people all the time. They destroyed my peoples' great temple and scattered us across the known world in a little thing known as the "Diaspora." After fighting Carthage, they were quite spiteful in how they ravaged the land. They watched human slaves fight and die and called it amusement. And Attila's largest slaughter of innocents was under <strong>Rome's payroll</strong>, and they were pleased with his work. So yeah, they do seem to have problems occasionally with taking the times into account. Attila seemed barely worse if at all worse than the Romans to me.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yeah, I get that. But over the years, I've kind of shifted more to the perspective that the story is much about overcoming a challenge with brute force than it is thinking outside the box. But I understand the argument.</p><p></p><p>To compare, I watched the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles cartoon as a kid. One of the only parts I distinctly remember to this day was one episode where their sensei was having them practice fighting against some mechanical enemy, trying to defeat it. They were doing badly. Then, Raphael (my favorite turtle) coems in, calmly walks around it to the power outlet it's attached to, and unplugs it. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /></p><p>That's a better example of thinking outside of the box, IMHO.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="StreamOfTheSky, post: 4997786, member: 35909"] They try... First off, they have a scale that they use for the grading. All the typical things you would consider evil work against (or for?) the person, while they also try to find redeeming qualities or historical bias. In Attila's case, redeeming qualities included being a caring family man apprently, and historical bias in the sense that only Romans -- his sworn enemy -- have written contemporary accounts of him, so it is quite reasonable to question if he was given fair treatment. They also have a separate metric called "creativity." Without definition, I thought creativity in the sense of "new and uniquely cruel actions done," but they defined it as what the person created, legacy left behind, etc... Since Attila left...nothing, that probably hurt his score a lot. The show may have been most harsh on his impaling of traitors and a few cases where he massacred innocent women and children. I don't think that's terribly fair for as you said, the historical context. Romans killed innocent people all the time. They destroyed my peoples' great temple and scattered us across the known world in a little thing known as the "Diaspora." After fighting Carthage, they were quite spiteful in how they ravaged the land. They watched human slaves fight and die and called it amusement. And Attila's largest slaughter of innocents was under [b]Rome's payroll[/b], and they were pleased with his work. So yeah, they do seem to have problems occasionally with taking the times into account. Attila seemed barely worse if at all worse than the Romans to me. Yeah, I get that. But over the years, I've kind of shifted more to the perspective that the story is much about overcoming a challenge with brute force than it is thinking outside the box. But I understand the argument. To compare, I watched the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles cartoon as a kid. One of the only parts I distinctly remember to this day was one episode where their sensei was having them practice fighting against some mechanical enemy, trying to defeat it. They were doing badly. Then, Raphael (my favorite turtle) coems in, calmly walks around it to the power outlet it's attached to, and unplugs it. :D That's a better example of thinking outside of the box, IMHO. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Ancients Behaving Badly
Top