Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Ancients Behaving Badly
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Thunderfoot" data-source="post: 5026496" data-attributes="member: 34175"><p>I have an answer for this, but you're not going to like it.</p><p>You see The History channel is run by Discovery Networks, and if you have been paying attention across the DSC board, all of their channels, Discovery, Discovery International, History channel, History International, Military channel, SyFy, the Science channel, etc. have all been undergoing a slight cosmetic alteration.</p><p></p><p>All of the programming on DN channels <em>was</em> watcher/content specific, History for military historians (until they created the military channel), Science for science geek, SciFi for science fiction geeks, etc. and this was fine; except a couple years back the company underwent a changeover in their higher-up (three years I think, but I'm too lazy to check) and that's about when things started altering. See now they are actual looking for "ratings shares" not that cable/satellite channels have ever done it in the past, but hey, why not. So starting with Discovery, they started doing reality shows to draw in more viewers, and it worked, but then some genius decided to start moving shows to other channels to "share the wealth". Now <u>Ghost Hunters</u> on SciFi made sense, <u>Junkyard Wars</u> on The Science Channel made sense, <u>Special Ops</u> on the military channel made sense, but what in any thing would a reality show on the history channel would make sense. They only thing I see that soul have worked was what PBS did a few years ago with the "house" series (<u>1800's House</u>, <u>1900's House</u>, <u>1700's Community</u>) where modern people were put into old world situations for 30-90 days and made to live according to historical standards, but the budget for those kinds of shows are out of this world. ([seedy marketing voice] "And of course, re-enactors are just plain sad, right?" [/seedy marketing voice] *rolleyes*)</p><p></p><p>So you get <u>Pawn Stars</u>, yeah lots of history on that show, I mean it's about old stuff right? And what about <u>Ice Road Truckers</u>, those guys are all old relics, so that fits. And <u>Gangland</u> is about... umm... mobsters, yeah cause their... umm old skool... umm... yeah.</p><p>Frankly whatever marketing weenie is pulling programming dollars from good historical shows and funding this tripe should be drawn and quartered, which <em>IS</em> historical and would be great programming for The History Channel. I know I'd watch it. <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/glasses.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt="B-)" title="Glasses B-)" data-shortname="B-)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Thunderfoot, post: 5026496, member: 34175"] I have an answer for this, but you're not going to like it. You see The History channel is run by Discovery Networks, and if you have been paying attention across the DSC board, all of their channels, Discovery, Discovery International, History channel, History International, Military channel, SyFy, the Science channel, etc. have all been undergoing a slight cosmetic alteration. All of the programming on DN channels [I]was[/I] watcher/content specific, History for military historians (until they created the military channel), Science for science geek, SciFi for science fiction geeks, etc. and this was fine; except a couple years back the company underwent a changeover in their higher-up (three years I think, but I'm too lazy to check) and that's about when things started altering. See now they are actual looking for "ratings shares" not that cable/satellite channels have ever done it in the past, but hey, why not. So starting with Discovery, they started doing reality shows to draw in more viewers, and it worked, but then some genius decided to start moving shows to other channels to "share the wealth". Now [U]Ghost Hunters[/U] on SciFi made sense, [U]Junkyard Wars[/U] on The Science Channel made sense, [U]Special Ops[/U] on the military channel made sense, but what in any thing would a reality show on the history channel would make sense. They only thing I see that soul have worked was what PBS did a few years ago with the "house" series ([U]1800's House[/U], [U]1900's House[/U], [U]1700's Community[/U]) where modern people were put into old world situations for 30-90 days and made to live according to historical standards, but the budget for those kinds of shows are out of this world. ([seedy marketing voice] "And of course, re-enactors are just plain sad, right?" [/seedy marketing voice] *rolleyes*) So you get [U]Pawn Stars[/U], yeah lots of history on that show, I mean it's about old stuff right? And what about [U]Ice Road Truckers[/U], those guys are all old relics, so that fits. And [U]Gangland[/U] is about... umm... mobsters, yeah cause their... umm old skool... umm... yeah. Frankly whatever marketing weenie is pulling programming dollars from good historical shows and funding this tripe should be drawn and quartered, which [I]IS[/I] historical and would be great programming for The History Channel. I know I'd watch it. B-) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Ancients Behaving Badly
Top