Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="tetrasodium" data-source="post: 9648971" data-attributes="member: 93670">True, but skynet is a very primitive and limited form of ai. Its technological advancements are more plausibly attributed to things captured from orforced from humans if not the product of passed timelines that had their methods carried forward into new timelines where humanity was judged unworthy. That goes back to the paperclip problem demonstrating a limitation in the ai itself.&nbsp; For whatever reason it's incapable of having or making use of higher levels decision making that would allow growth and adaptation. We hadn't really explored or considered some of the concepts that only become involved with things like an AI to draw a line between artificial intelligence and artificial sentience/life when Terminator first came out, but that was decades ago and we've developed both the technology and philosophical/ethical considerations a lot since then.&nbsp; Terminator zero even has humans create at least one totally new ai from the tech skynet uses in order to avoid it.There is even fiction that explored the difference in capability between a paperclip producing level malfunctioning AI and far more advanced ones capable of choice and free will of thought.&nbsp; Going to link <a href="https://youtu.be/y_hObbkO3TQ?si=DOWK4EBKd8p5ctiq" target="_blank">the new species</a> as an example because it has one with a bunch of any net-like similarities and the distinction between ape/human or ai/artificial sentience is focused on at times.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="tetrasodium, post: 9648971, member: 93670"] True, but skynet is a very primitive and limited form of ai. Its technological advancements are more plausibly attributed to things captured from orforced from humans if not the product of passed timelines that had their methods carried forward into new timelines where humanity was judged unworthy. That goes back to the paperclip problem demonstrating a limitation in the ai itself. For whatever reason it's incapable of having or making use of higher levels decision making that would allow growth and adaptation. We hadn't really explored or considered some of the concepts that only become involved with things like an AI to draw a line between artificial intelligence and artificial sentience/life when Terminator first came out, but that was decades ago and we've developed both the technology and philosophical/ethical considerations a lot since then. Terminator zero even has humans create at least one totally new ai from the tech skynet uses in order to avoid it. There is even fiction that explored the difference in capability between a paperclip producing level malfunctioning AI and far more advanced ones capable of choice and free will of thought. Going to link [URL='https://youtu.be/y_hObbkO3TQ?si=DOWK4EBKd8p5ctiq']the new species[/URL] as an example because it has one with a bunch of any net-like similarities and the distinction between ape/human or ai/artificial sentience is focused on at times. [/QUOTE]

Verification