Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Emerikol" data-source="post: 6322936" data-attributes="member: 6698278">I'm coming to dislike Sean's opinions more and more.&nbsp; Darkvision is pure gamism.&nbsp; It works because it works.&nbsp; No explanation.&nbsp; The very issue with infravision is that it is a natural explanation.&nbsp;&nbsp; I'm not for coming up with something different that has some basis for how it works.&nbsp; I do not believe dwarves are magical 24/7 so I'd like a natural explanation for how they see in the dark other than - they just do.&nbsp;&nbsp; Those kinds of answers are never satisfying for me.&nbsp;&nbsp; I don't mind that the world works differently but I want it to have a basis for how it works.&nbsp; It is why I prefer there to exist a theory of magic and not just have every spell be an arbitrary exception.I agree with SKR.&nbsp; It will never be in D&amp;D ever again.&nbsp;&nbsp; Infravision though was not an oversight in the old days.&nbsp; They just cared about this stuff and nowadays the developers do not.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Emerikol, post: 6322936, member: 6698278"] I'm coming to dislike Sean's opinions more and more. Darkvision is pure gamism. It works because it works. No explanation. The very issue with infravision is that it is a natural explanation. I'm not for coming up with something different that has some basis for how it works. I do not believe dwarves are magical 24/7 so I'd like a natural explanation for how they see in the dark other than - they just do. Those kinds of answers are never satisfying for me. I don't mind that the world works differently but I want it to have a basis for how it works. It is why I prefer there to exist a theory of magic and not just have every spell be an arbitrary exception. I agree with SKR. It will never be in D&D ever again. Infravision though was not an oversight in the old days. They just cared about this stuff and nowadays the developers do not. [/QUOTE]

Verification