Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
(Anecdotal) conversations with Asian gamers on some problems they currently face in the D&D world of RPG gaming
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Guest&nbsp; 85555" data-source="post: 8077684"><p>Regarding OA specifically, I think there is a few things going on here. </p><p></p><p>One I think most people on this thread would agree the book has issues that are worth discussing. We don't all agree about all of the recent criticisms though. I watched the entire youtube series about OA, and I found some of the critiques were valid, some really, really seemed to be a stretch. But that said, there is no question, if OA were to come out today it would probably be done differently. </p><p></p><p>Two, the question of what to do with existing OA material. If we were just talking about new OA books, that would be one thing. But this conversation became about whether the original OA book should remain up for sale as is, and if the content of that book should be changed. I have a big problem with taking the book down or changing it. That is the reason I stepped into this conversation. And my reasons are not simple. I am both troubled by the idea that we should ignore or purge content that doesn't fit modern sensibilities (this seems like a very victorian reaction to me), but also this book was made, it is a part of history and part of the legacy of the line that WOTC inherited. I think it is important, especially if folks find it offensive, for others to be able to see the text themselves and decide if they agree. </p><p></p><p>Three, criticisms of OA. I have no issues with people critiquing OA. I think there is plenty to critique. And I think the conversation is a perfectly reasonable one to have in the gaming community. Where I start to have problems is 1) saying that the 1985 OA should come down because of modern sensibilities (to me this is like trying to take Huck Finn down from a sales page because it contains content that might upset modern readers), 2) saying we all have to agree with the critiques made about OA. We are going to have different opinions on this one. And some people will have more charitable readings of it, while others will have less charitable readings. But an orthodox opinion is forming and that is what concerns me.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Guest 85555, post: 8077684"] Regarding OA specifically, I think there is a few things going on here. One I think most people on this thread would agree the book has issues that are worth discussing. We don't all agree about all of the recent criticisms though. I watched the entire youtube series about OA, and I found some of the critiques were valid, some really, really seemed to be a stretch. But that said, there is no question, if OA were to come out today it would probably be done differently. Two, the question of what to do with existing OA material. If we were just talking about new OA books, that would be one thing. But this conversation became about whether the original OA book should remain up for sale as is, and if the content of that book should be changed. I have a big problem with taking the book down or changing it. That is the reason I stepped into this conversation. And my reasons are not simple. I am both troubled by the idea that we should ignore or purge content that doesn't fit modern sensibilities (this seems like a very victorian reaction to me), but also this book was made, it is a part of history and part of the legacy of the line that WOTC inherited. I think it is important, especially if folks find it offensive, for others to be able to see the text themselves and decide if they agree. Three, criticisms of OA. I have no issues with people critiquing OA. I think there is plenty to critique. And I think the conversation is a perfectly reasonable one to have in the gaming community. Where I start to have problems is 1) saying that the 1985 OA should come down because of modern sensibilities (to me this is like trying to take Huck Finn down from a sales page because it contains content that might upset modern readers), 2) saying we all have to agree with the critiques made about OA. We are going to have different opinions on this one. And some people will have more charitable readings of it, while others will have less charitable readings. But an orthodox opinion is forming and that is what concerns me. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
(Anecdotal) conversations with Asian gamers on some problems they currently face in the D&D world of RPG gaming
Top