Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="jefgorbach" data-source="post: 5232824" data-attributes="member: 28278">I'm sure others will disagree, but it seems like you've got two options, depending on your style: 1. liable magic - he's experienced with as an arcane caster so controls (4x17 undead). However his deity, recognizing the value of the spell, likewise answers the spell request for an additional (4x3) ... allowing him to control upto 80 hd.2. highest caster level - per above, however his deity refuses the request feeling no single individual could handle such responsibility, so limits his control to the most controllable using either class singularly (68hd); regardless of whether he casts arcanely or divinely. 3. Arcane and Divine magic are fundamentally different to such an extent&nbsp; that although the game mechanics appear on both the Arcane and Divine lists, each are completely separate spells. However doing so effectively duplicates option #1 since there would be no valid reason he couldn't cast it divinely, then immediately recast it arcanely (since the underlying magics providing the control would neither stack nor overlap).</blockquote>

[QUOTE="jefgorbach, post: 5232824, member: 28278"] I'm sure others will disagree, but it seems like you've got two options, depending on your style: 1. liable magic - he's experienced with as an arcane caster so controls (4x17 undead). However his deity, recognizing the value of the spell, likewise answers the spell request for an additional (4x3) ... allowing him to control upto 80 hd. 2. highest caster level - per above, however his deity refuses the request feeling no single individual could handle such responsibility, so limits his control to the most controllable using either class singularly (68hd); regardless of whether he casts arcanely or divinely. 3. Arcane and Divine magic are fundamentally different to such an extent that although the game mechanics appear on both the Arcane and Divine lists, each are completely separate spells. However doing so effectively duplicates option #1 since there would be no valid reason he couldn't cast it divinely, then immediately recast it arcanely (since the underlying magics providing the control would neither stack nor overlap). [/QUOTE]

Verification