Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Another Cease and Desist Letter: 4E Powercards
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Azgulor" data-source="post: 4675267" data-attributes="member: 14291"><p>And here we are at the impasse. While the action taken may be right and proper for WotC, it is of zero benefit to the customer - and that is an issue for some people. Usually it's an issue for 100% of the customers.</p><p></p><p>For example, I have cable companies that are MY customers. I've sat in meetings where they've explained why they offer channel packages versus a la carte channel subscription and I understand that as their operating costs rise, they must raise prices to cover those costs.</p><p></p><p>However, as a cable customer, I also get ticked off when a rate hike is announced or when the ads for new customers promises a lower rate not available for existing customers - until I call and request it <em>and they give it to me</em>. They want to make as much margin off me as they can. I want them to make as little margin off me as possible while providing the services & products I want.</p><p></p><p>See, I get where WotC is coming from in terms of business objectives. I'm a capitalist - I applaud the pursuit of making as much money as they can <em>while satisfying their customers</em>. However, as a customer, I want the most I can get for the least amount of money. The more choices I have the better. It's the nature of the supplier:customer relationship. Most of the time it's mutually beneficial but there are instances where they are at odds with one another. It's not good nor bad. It's the nature of the beast.</p><p></p><p>What I don't get is the mentality of certain customers of always viewing the world through the business-oriented lens of the supplier (WotC in this case). I may understand and appreciate their point of view, but to blindly support it even where it may cost me more money, give me fewer choices, etc. makes no sense to me from a customer's point of view. And except for those on the WotC payroll, at the end of the day we're all customers.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Azgulor, post: 4675267, member: 14291"] And here we are at the impasse. While the action taken may be right and proper for WotC, it is of zero benefit to the customer - and that is an issue for some people. Usually it's an issue for 100% of the customers. For example, I have cable companies that are MY customers. I've sat in meetings where they've explained why they offer channel packages versus a la carte channel subscription and I understand that as their operating costs rise, they must raise prices to cover those costs. However, as a cable customer, I also get ticked off when a rate hike is announced or when the ads for new customers promises a lower rate not available for existing customers - until I call and request it [I]and they give it to me[/I]. They want to make as much margin off me as they can. I want them to make as little margin off me as possible while providing the services & products I want. See, I get where WotC is coming from in terms of business objectives. I'm a capitalist - I applaud the pursuit of making as much money as they can [I]while satisfying their customers[/I]. However, as a customer, I want the most I can get for the least amount of money. The more choices I have the better. It's the nature of the supplier:customer relationship. Most of the time it's mutually beneficial but there are instances where they are at odds with one another. It's not good nor bad. It's the nature of the beast. What I don't get is the mentality of certain customers of always viewing the world through the business-oriented lens of the supplier (WotC in this case). I may understand and appreciate their point of view, but to blindly support it even where it may cost me more money, give me fewer choices, etc. makes no sense to me from a customer's point of view. And except for those on the WotC payroll, at the end of the day we're all customers. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Another Cease and Desist Letter: 4E Powercards
Top