Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Shemeska" data-source="post: 3142960" data-attributes="member: 11697">I'd be happy to, besides it'll give me something to do while I'm waiting to hear back on a pair of queries of my own. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />I say go with option #1Sounds like a plan, I just think you can easily get by with naming him and remaining true to the source material, especially given how the original restrictions are not longer in place to prevent it. And in any event, you can openly name him without referencing/connecting him to the larger Chinese pantheon. Most folks reading that recognize him by name will probably be happy to have the flavor included once again.As a monster on their own, or in connection to the Dabus? And honestly, I don't see the Dabus getting in on a query outside of an article giving a broader context on them. You talk about the Dabus and you've got to include Sigil, Her Serenity, Rebus, etc. It deserves a longer amount of flavor than is typically allowed in a compilation article with numerous monsters. Just my 0.02 jink on the matter though, it's you guys' query.I don't think there's any debate about them being "servants of the Lady of Pain". They're rather open about that. They just won't talk about details. When asked where they come from however, they'll say that they came from/were created from Sigil or somesuch. I'd have to look up the reference for what the line actually was though.</blockquote>

Verification