Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Another Deadly Session, and It's Getting Old
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CapnZapp" data-source="post: 8104107" data-attributes="member: 12731"><p>Note: since the forum upgrade, the "ridonkulous bonus" mentioned upthread had its link vanish. I expect there will be many broken/disappeared links where the poster provided a text for the link. </p><p></p><p>But let's revisit the actual argument. First, here's the link:</p><p></p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://roll20.net/compendium/dnd5e/Pass%20without%20Trace[/URL]</p><p></p><p>The intended takeaway was and is: </p><p></p><p>If you design a ruleset and want to encourage stealth, you need to enable the entire group. You can do that in various ways. For example, by having an ability that lets the point man to roll for the entire group. A single roll for all four heroes. </p><p></p><p>Or you can provide a really large bonus, like how 5th Edition gives out +10. That's the linked "ridonkulous bonus".</p><p></p><p>The context is that Pathfinder 2 would never give you anything more than a +2, tops. And what "follow the leader" actually does provide, is to let you apply your level to proficiency plus half the leader's proficiency level bonus. That is easily not enough - the statistical probability of at least one character still failing remains far too high.</p><p></p><p>By "far too high" I specifically mean that the alternative, that not everybody is included in the stealth mission, becomes a far better option, mathematically speaking. And that is bad for a group game.</p><p></p><p>To repeat myself, follow the leader remains useful in cases where failure is personal, but not in cases where one failure defines the outcome for the entire group.</p><p></p><p>Tl;dr: 5E gets it, PF2 don't</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CapnZapp, post: 8104107, member: 12731"] Note: since the forum upgrade, the "ridonkulous bonus" mentioned upthread had its link vanish. I expect there will be many broken/disappeared links where the poster provided a text for the link. But let's revisit the actual argument. First, here's the link: [URL unfurl="true"]https://roll20.net/compendium/dnd5e/Pass%20without%20Trace[/URL] The intended takeaway was and is: If you design a ruleset and want to encourage stealth, you need to enable the entire group. You can do that in various ways. For example, by having an ability that lets the point man to roll for the entire group. A single roll for all four heroes. Or you can provide a really large bonus, like how 5th Edition gives out +10. That's the linked "ridonkulous bonus". The context is that Pathfinder 2 would never give you anything more than a +2, tops. And what "follow the leader" actually does provide, is to let you apply your level to proficiency plus half the leader's proficiency level bonus. That is easily not enough - the statistical probability of at least one character still failing remains far too high. By "far too high" I specifically mean that the alternative, that not everybody is included in the stealth mission, becomes a far better option, mathematically speaking. And that is bad for a group game. To repeat myself, follow the leader remains useful in cases where failure is personal, but not in cases where one failure defines the outcome for the entire group. Tl;dr: 5E gets it, PF2 don't [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Another Deadly Session, and It's Getting Old
Top