Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="TrippyHippy" data-source="post: 7729647" data-attributes="member: 27252">I have a couple of issues with some subclasses. &nbsp;- I don't get why people find having a Death Domain for Clerics so wrong. Clerics of Death, and the reverence of Death are historical things. Why can't you play them? Why is this worse than having Necromancers?&nbsp;- Will the advent of the Hexblade mean that nobody will pick anything else for the Pact of the Blade from now on? &nbsp;- Similarly, is the War Wizard essentially a replacement for both Abjuration and Evocation Schools, in effect meaning that we have seven schools rather than eight now? &nbsp;- I found the Ranger sub-classes a bit non descriptive and thematically weak; indeed the entire Class is a bit problematic in the 5E. &nbsp;- Are the Paladin subclasses actually all that playable for most groups? That said, the new options for Fighters, Rogues and Sorcerers really make those Classes really good.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="TrippyHippy, post: 7729647, member: 27252"] I have a couple of issues with some subclasses. - I don't get why people find having a Death Domain for Clerics so wrong. Clerics of Death, and the reverence of Death are historical things. Why can't you play them? Why is this worse than having Necromancers? - Will the advent of the Hexblade mean that nobody will pick anything else for the Pact of the Blade from now on? - Similarly, is the War Wizard essentially a replacement for both Abjuration and Evocation Schools, in effect meaning that we have seven schools rather than eight now? - I found the Ranger sub-classes a bit non descriptive and thematically weak; indeed the entire Class is a bit problematic in the 5E. - Are the Paladin subclasses actually all that playable for most groups? That said, the new options for Fighters, Rogues and Sorcerers really make those Classes really good. [/QUOTE]

Verification