Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Another "Dominate" question
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Arrowhawk" data-source="post: 5752577" data-attributes="member: 6679551"><p>I'm sure you haven't seen anyone play the Dominate spell in such a way. There are undoubtedly many ways to interpret how the spell works. But I'll share with you some of the Rule of the Game statements made specifically about Dominate Person:</p><p></p><p style="margin-left: 20px">As with the suggestion spell, it pays to be careful how you phrase orders. For example, <strong>if you order a subject to attack its ally</strong>, it almost certainly will get a saving throw to throw off the spell. <strong>The subject, however, can accomplish this order with a single action.</strong> If you repeat the order, the subject will get a new saving throw. On the other hand, if you order a subject to slay one of its allies, the subject will get only one saving throw.</p><p></p><p>It's a safe bet Greenfield would never consider that the "attack your ally" command would be completed with one swing of the sword. </p><p></p><p>The other important point of contention is some people want to impose a "to the best of your abilities" clause in with Dominate. The rule makes no such requirement. Neither does RotG talk about any such requirement. RotG does use that language with the <em>Command</em> spell, but not with Dominate.</p><p></p><p>Let's look at Command in the SRD</p><p></p><p style="margin-left: 20px">You give the subject a single command, <strong>which it obeys to the best of its ability</strong> at its earliest opportunity. You may select from the following options.</p><p></p><p>SRD also includes that requirement with Summon Nature's Ally, but not with Dominate. So WotC clearly knows about using that phrase. For me, the fact that "to the best of its abilities" is absent, signifies a material omission to the manner in which the spell is intended to work. Like anything, a DM can always Rule 0 that requirement in there, but RAW doesn't have it.</p><p></p><p>Now, how quickly someone will attempt to go to sleep is not covered. Do they go find a bed, do they walk around until they get tired, do they lay down on the floor, would they drink a Sleeping potion if they had one handy, do they attempt to sleep standing up?...no definitive answer.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Arrowhawk, post: 5752577, member: 6679551"] I'm sure you haven't seen anyone play the Dominate spell in such a way. There are undoubtedly many ways to interpret how the spell works. But I'll share with you some of the Rule of the Game statements made specifically about Dominate Person: [INDENT]As with the suggestion spell, it pays to be careful how you phrase orders. For example, [B]if you order a subject to attack its ally[/B], it almost certainly will get a saving throw to throw off the spell. [B]The subject, however, can accomplish this order with a single action.[/B] If you repeat the order, the subject will get a new saving throw. On the other hand, if you order a subject to slay one of its allies, the subject will get only one saving throw.[/INDENT] It's a safe bet Greenfield would never consider that the "attack your ally" command would be completed with one swing of the sword. The other important point of contention is some people want to impose a "to the best of your abilities" clause in with Dominate. The rule makes no such requirement. Neither does RotG talk about any such requirement. RotG does use that language with the [i]Command[/i] spell, but not with Dominate. Let's look at Command in the SRD [INDENT]You give the subject a single command, [B]which it obeys to the best of its ability[/B] at its earliest opportunity. You may select from the following options.[/INDENT] SRD also includes that requirement with Summon Nature's Ally, but not with Dominate. So WotC clearly knows about using that phrase. For me, the fact that "to the best of its abilities" is absent, signifies a material omission to the manner in which the spell is intended to work. Like anything, a DM can always Rule 0 that requirement in there, but RAW doesn't have it. Now, how quickly someone will attempt to go to sleep is not covered. Do they go find a bed, do they walk around until they get tired, do they lay down on the floor, would they drink a Sleeping potion if they had one handy, do they attempt to sleep standing up?...no definitive answer. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Another "Dominate" question
Top