Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="malkav666" data-source="post: 4868791" data-attributes="member: 70565">If he did not want to get quoted, then it should have been a private document. As it stands he posted in a format viewable to all, which leads me to believe that the intent was to share it. The information wants to be free <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />And I am OK with him placing his opinions on his blog. I don't read his blog, but I do read ENW (which is where I found the article). All I am saying is that this guy has a history of flame(ish) postings, and I can't help but wonder if getting quoted on ENW is not exactly what the guy intended.But I withdraw. I am not going to debate about some grogblog. the guy obviously has some strong feelings on newer systems. I don't like 4e either, but the difference, is that I don't think it is systemic of/or a portent of an industry problem. I think it is just a matter of taste. (obviously, you could insert any system into that statement right where 4e is for me).love,malkav</blockquote>