Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Another Shadowdancer Thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="silentspace" data-source="post: 1946086" data-attributes="member: 14316"><p>The RAW...</p><p></p><p>Let's say there is an area of shadowy illumination. There are two rogues, Rogue A and Rogue B, neither of which has the HIPS ability. Rogue A is hidden 5' from Target. Rogue B is hidden 10' from Target. Rogue A can melee attack Target and remain hidden if she makes a Hide check at a -20 penalty that beats the Target's Spot check. Rogue B has two options. She can snipe, then hide at a -20 penalty per the Sniping rule. Or she can can make a ranged attack at a -20 penalty to remain hidden while attacking. The standard attacking rule (-20 penalty to hide while attacking), is superior to the sniping rule (which makes you visible before hiding again), since if you become visible before hiding again, you become vulnerable to readied attacks.</p><p></p><p>* * *</p><p></p><p>Not the RAW...</p><p></p><p>IMO, the thing that stands out about the sniping rule is that it is sort of a HIPS ability. The sniping rule says Rogue B is not hiding while attacking, but hiding <em>after</em> attacking. Since Rogue B is not hiding while attacking, she is visible to Target. But after Rogue B's attack, she can hide again, at a -20 penalty, even though she is visible to Target. In other words, Rogue B can HIPS with a -20 penalty in certain conditions (if she was hidden before the ranged attack and was at 10 feet away). But is she fails her hide check, she apparently cannot hide again. </p><p></p><p>Rogue A cannot hide again once Target spots her, since she is visible and in plain sight.</p><p></p><p>As an extrapolation of the sniping rule, I'd allow anyone to hide in plain sight while being observed at a -20 penalty as a move action if they have cover or concealment and are at least 10 feet away from all observers.</p><p></p><p>* * *</p><p></p><p>RAW again...</p><p></p><p>In contrast...</p><p></p><p>A ranger with the HIPS (Ex) ability can hide while being observed in natural environments at no penalty, but only if the ranger has concealment or cover. So if in a forest with shadowy illumination, the ranger can attack while hiding at a -20 penalty. If the ranger is spotted, he can make a new hide check (as a move action or combined with a move action) at no penalty. Likewise, he can hide after sniping at no penalty. (Rambo lives!)</p><p></p><p>A shadowdancer with the HIPS (Su) ability can hide while being observed as long as she is within 10' of shadow, even without concealment or cover. So if within 10 feet of a target that casts a shadow, she can attack while hiding at a -20 penalty. If the shadowdancer is spotted, she can make a new hide check (as a move action or combined with a move action) at no penalty. Likewise, she can hide after sniping at no penalty.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="silentspace, post: 1946086, member: 14316"] The RAW... Let's say there is an area of shadowy illumination. There are two rogues, Rogue A and Rogue B, neither of which has the HIPS ability. Rogue A is hidden 5' from Target. Rogue B is hidden 10' from Target. Rogue A can melee attack Target and remain hidden if she makes a Hide check at a -20 penalty that beats the Target's Spot check. Rogue B has two options. She can snipe, then hide at a -20 penalty per the Sniping rule. Or she can can make a ranged attack at a -20 penalty to remain hidden while attacking. The standard attacking rule (-20 penalty to hide while attacking), is superior to the sniping rule (which makes you visible before hiding again), since if you become visible before hiding again, you become vulnerable to readied attacks. * * * Not the RAW... IMO, the thing that stands out about the sniping rule is that it is sort of a HIPS ability. The sniping rule says Rogue B is not hiding while attacking, but hiding [I]after[/I] attacking. Since Rogue B is not hiding while attacking, she is visible to Target. But after Rogue B's attack, she can hide again, at a -20 penalty, even though she is visible to Target. In other words, Rogue B can HIPS with a -20 penalty in certain conditions (if she was hidden before the ranged attack and was at 10 feet away). But is she fails her hide check, she apparently cannot hide again. Rogue A cannot hide again once Target spots her, since she is visible and in plain sight. As an extrapolation of the sniping rule, I'd allow anyone to hide in plain sight while being observed at a -20 penalty as a move action if they have cover or concealment and are at least 10 feet away from all observers. * * * RAW again... In contrast... A ranger with the HIPS (Ex) ability can hide while being observed in natural environments at no penalty, but only if the ranger has concealment or cover. So if in a forest with shadowy illumination, the ranger can attack while hiding at a -20 penalty. If the ranger is spotted, he can make a new hide check (as a move action or combined with a move action) at no penalty. Likewise, he can hide after sniping at no penalty. (Rambo lives!) A shadowdancer with the HIPS (Su) ability can hide while being observed as long as she is within 10' of shadow, even without concealment or cover. So if within 10 feet of a target that casts a shadow, she can attack while hiding at a -20 penalty. If the shadowdancer is spotted, she can make a new hide check (as a move action or combined with a move action) at no penalty. Likewise, she can hide after sniping at no penalty. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Another Shadowdancer Thread
Top