Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Mouseferatu" data-source="post: 4200855" data-attributes="member: 1288">Because the best way to piss someone off when they're being generous--far more so than they have to be--is to demand even more?Because WotC is letting people play with their toys already, when there was no reason they had to?Because the restrictions they've put in place are neither unreasonable nor immoral by any widely accepted definition?Because it was apparently a fight to get things even this open, and the last thing we want is to give WotC's lawyers reason to regret it?Because both business sense and common courtesy should encourage us to work with WotC on this, not against them? (And if neither of those is enough, consider WotC's legal budget.)I think trying to use the letter of the law to violate the spirit of it is the best way to ensure it'll never be more open than it is now.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Mouseferatu, post: 4200855, member: 1288"] Because the best way to piss someone off when they're being generous--far more so than they have to be--is to demand even more? Because WotC is letting people play with their toys already, when there was no reason they had to? Because the restrictions they've put in place are neither unreasonable nor immoral by any widely accepted definition? Because it was apparently a fight to get things even this open, and the last thing we want is to give WotC's lawyers reason to regret it? Because both business sense and common courtesy should encourage us to work [i]with[/i] WotC on this, not against them? (And if neither of those is enough, consider WotC's legal budget.) I think trying to use the letter of the law to violate the spirit of it is the best way to ensure it'll [i]never[/i] be more open than it is now. [/QUOTE]

Verification