Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Bacris" data-source="post: 3377345" data-attributes="member: 42502">And this seems to be accurate.&nbsp; I can understand putting some penalties on it, and I even agree with some of them, but the mound that you're heaping on it seems like the simple desire to remove it, without just coming out and flat out removing it, thereby giving the illusion of giving the players all the same options, when in reality, any player in their right mind wouldn't use such a weapon.&nbsp; This string of events then comes across as more passive-aggressive in a desire to remove a weapon you don't want in your game than an attempt to make it more conceptually accurate, because it would then be a necessity to make the other weapons more &quot;real,&quot; but as this is not being done, it's comes across as a bias on this weapon that results in over-penalizing.Just my opinion.&nbsp; <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Bacris, post: 3377345, member: 42502"] And this seems to be accurate. I can understand putting some penalties on it, and I even agree with some of them, but the mound that you're heaping on it seems like the simple desire to remove it, without just coming out and flat out removing it, thereby giving the illusion of giving the players all the same options, when in reality, any player in their right mind wouldn't use such a weapon. This string of events then comes across as more passive-aggressive in a desire to remove a weapon you don't want in your game than an attempt to make it more conceptually accurate, because it would then be a necessity to make the other weapons more "real," but as this is not being done, it's comes across as a bias on this weapon that results in over-penalizing. Just my opinion. :) [/QUOTE]

Verification