Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Any New Info on Skill Encounters?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Derren" data-source="post: 4088658" data-attributes="member: 2518"><p>By gamist I mean that in 4E there is a mechanic behind this whole skill scene which says "after X skill checks the characters win/loose" no matter where in the game world the characters currently are. To flee from a city the goal isn't to somehow overcome the walls and shaking off any pursuers but to simply succeed in X number of skill checks.</p><p>Or that you are simply given a bonus just because you take the hard road and succeed for no real reason.</p><p></p><p>Of course the DM can decide that some skill checks do not count but then you can also throw out this 4E system completely and simply let the PC do what he wants. As long as he reaches his goal (being outside of the city) everything goals without artificial limits and arbitrary difficulty levels.</p><p>This sort of skill encounter is a good advice, but a mechanic for it is imo completely unnecessary.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Why should there be a princess? And why should the princess value the opinion of the PC more because he climbed a hard wall instead of an easy wall?</p><p>Thats the core problem. With the 4E system the mechanics determine the (in game) reality. "You climbed a hard wall, so there is a princess on the other side" and not the more realistic approach where the situation in the in game reality determine the mechanics like "There is a princess on the other side of this hard to climb wall, do you want to climb it anyway?"</p><p></p><p>Or to use a other example</p><p>4E: You made your knowledge local check so there is a small, not much known alley in the next side street even though on the city map it is a dead end.</p><p>"3E": You made you knowledge local check so you know that the next side street is a dead end.</p><p></p><p>I favor the "3E" approach where the reality doesn't change just because the PC made a successful skill check. I also favor skill challenges where the PC have to reach a real goal (like getting outside of the city) instead of just having to succeed in X skill checks and then they win no matter where they actually are in the city.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Derren, post: 4088658, member: 2518"] By gamist I mean that in 4E there is a mechanic behind this whole skill scene which says "after X skill checks the characters win/loose" no matter where in the game world the characters currently are. To flee from a city the goal isn't to somehow overcome the walls and shaking off any pursuers but to simply succeed in X number of skill checks. Or that you are simply given a bonus just because you take the hard road and succeed for no real reason. Of course the DM can decide that some skill checks do not count but then you can also throw out this 4E system completely and simply let the PC do what he wants. As long as he reaches his goal (being outside of the city) everything goals without artificial limits and arbitrary difficulty levels. This sort of skill encounter is a good advice, but a mechanic for it is imo completely unnecessary. Why should there be a princess? And why should the princess value the opinion of the PC more because he climbed a hard wall instead of an easy wall? Thats the core problem. With the 4E system the mechanics determine the (in game) reality. "You climbed a hard wall, so there is a princess on the other side" and not the more realistic approach where the situation in the in game reality determine the mechanics like "There is a princess on the other side of this hard to climb wall, do you want to climb it anyway?" Or to use a other example 4E: You made your knowledge local check so there is a small, not much known alley in the next side street even though on the city map it is a dead end. "3E": You made you knowledge local check so you know that the next side street is a dead end. I favor the "3E" approach where the reality doesn't change just because the PC made a successful skill check. I also favor skill challenges where the PC have to reach a real goal (like getting outside of the city) instead of just having to succeed in X skill checks and then they win no matter where they actually are in the city. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Any New Info on Skill Encounters?
Top