Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Any reason not to let PCs add Proficiency to all Saves?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="S'mon" data-source="post: 6574581" data-attributes="member: 463"><p>IMC, which is lowish magic Conanesque swords & sorcery, I would like a battle between say an 18th level Barbarian PC and six 3rd level evil priests not to be a kerbstomp victory for the evil priests. </p><p>Currently 5e does a great job of emulating Thulsa Doom's Domination & execution of Conan's mother at the start of CtB movie, but a bad job of emulating the final scene where Conan resists the Domination and executes Thulsa Doom in turn.</p><p></p><p>This discussion has been interesting and given me some things to look out for. I'm happy now that </p><p>all-good-saves won't break the game, and many thanks to [MENTION=996]Tony Vargas[/MENTION] for helpful contributions, </p><p>although I don't think all-good-saves is necessary if you are running a traditional 3e/4e-style setup </p><p>with a 4/5 PC group running through multiple 'built' encounters designed to challenge but not kill the </p><p>PCs. That's not how I ran pre-3e and it's not how I'd generally want to use 5e either, I like it that 5e seems robust enough to allow for a much more Status Quo/Environment based campaign design (also the 5e encounter-building and monster-building rules seem rather weak & messy to me, at least compared to 4e).</p><p></p><p>I see now one thing to bear in mind if I run 5e at the Meetup rather than via Dragonsfoot is that players coming from 3e/PF are going to be looking for more of a 3e approach to rules, and some degree of continuing caster supremacy, and may be disgruntled if they don't get it, so with 5e playstyle will be very important to emphasise.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="S'mon, post: 6574581, member: 463"] IMC, which is lowish magic Conanesque swords & sorcery, I would like a battle between say an 18th level Barbarian PC and six 3rd level evil priests not to be a kerbstomp victory for the evil priests. Currently 5e does a great job of emulating Thulsa Doom's Domination & execution of Conan's mother at the start of CtB movie, but a bad job of emulating the final scene where Conan resists the Domination and executes Thulsa Doom in turn. This discussion has been interesting and given me some things to look out for. I'm happy now that all-good-saves won't break the game, and many thanks to [MENTION=996]Tony Vargas[/MENTION] for helpful contributions, although I don't think all-good-saves is necessary if you are running a traditional 3e/4e-style setup with a 4/5 PC group running through multiple 'built' encounters designed to challenge but not kill the PCs. That's not how I ran pre-3e and it's not how I'd generally want to use 5e either, I like it that 5e seems robust enough to allow for a much more Status Quo/Environment based campaign design (also the 5e encounter-building and monster-building rules seem rather weak & messy to me, at least compared to 4e). I see now one thing to bear in mind if I run 5e at the Meetup rather than via Dragonsfoot is that players coming from 3e/PF are going to be looking for more of a 3e approach to rules, and some degree of continuing caster supremacy, and may be disgruntled if they don't get it, so with 5e playstyle will be very important to emphasise. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Any reason not to let PCs add Proficiency to all Saves?
Top