Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Anyone else feel like the distinction between conjuration and evocation is really muddy?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DEFCON 1" data-source="post: 6577631" data-attributes="member: 7006"><p>I would suspect that whether direct attack spells were conjuration or evocation comes down to making sure each school had some rather evenly, split up amongst the different energy types. The same way they've tried to make sure there were spells of all the different energy types at as many of the levels as possible (to help accommodate balance amongst the different Draconic Sorcerer bloodlines for example), they also seem to want to make sure Evocation doesn't get overpowered by assigning it every single direct damage spell, as would normally seem to be the case if you were to do a more scientific reclassification of where spells fell into which schools.</p><p></p><p>I mean truth be told... if wizards in-game truly did a "scientific" classification of all the spells they know into certain "schools"... I'm pretty sure there would end up being much more than the eight the D&D game uses. We're talking real life animal and plant levels of classification-- high level Kingdoms down through Phylum, Domain, Genus, Species and the like. Magic would be classified that same way. Spells that grant positive life energy would be split off from spells that attack with negative energy... spells that use a particular energy type would be grouped together... conjurations would be separate from summonings... illusions that directly affect a person's mind would be separate from graphic illusions in the environment... etc. etc. etc.</p><p></p><p>At the end of the day, I think WotC did what they did just so that they could maintain consistency with the tropes of the past, while also keeping schools relatively balanced whenever possible. They wanted to allow for players to play an "Illusionist" like they could back in the AD&D days... so they continued the school system and fudged things so that it could remain useful and worthwhile.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DEFCON 1, post: 6577631, member: 7006"] I would suspect that whether direct attack spells were conjuration or evocation comes down to making sure each school had some rather evenly, split up amongst the different energy types. The same way they've tried to make sure there were spells of all the different energy types at as many of the levels as possible (to help accommodate balance amongst the different Draconic Sorcerer bloodlines for example), they also seem to want to make sure Evocation doesn't get overpowered by assigning it every single direct damage spell, as would normally seem to be the case if you were to do a more scientific reclassification of where spells fell into which schools. I mean truth be told... if wizards in-game truly did a "scientific" classification of all the spells they know into certain "schools"... I'm pretty sure there would end up being much more than the eight the D&D game uses. We're talking real life animal and plant levels of classification-- high level Kingdoms down through Phylum, Domain, Genus, Species and the like. Magic would be classified that same way. Spells that grant positive life energy would be split off from spells that attack with negative energy... spells that use a particular energy type would be grouped together... conjurations would be separate from summonings... illusions that directly affect a person's mind would be separate from graphic illusions in the environment... etc. etc. etc. At the end of the day, I think WotC did what they did just so that they could maintain consistency with the tropes of the past, while also keeping schools relatively balanced whenever possible. They wanted to allow for players to play an "Illusionist" like they could back in the AD&D days... so they continued the school system and fudged things so that it could remain useful and worthwhile. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Anyone else feel like the distinction between conjuration and evocation is really muddy?
Top