Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Anyone else out there with rule overload?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Verision" data-source="post: 5228590" data-attributes="member: 72236"><p>I honestly have no idea what your point is. My problem was that I wanted to play by the rules and the rules didn't work. By the rules, in a skill challenge, you need to get X number of successful skill checks before Y number of failed checks. My PCs were failing checks, even though they were rolling well, because the DCs were too high.</p><p>Then the errata came out and I had the opposite problem; skill challenges weren't challenging because my PCs could roll poorly and still pass the DC. </p><p></p><p>Honestly, how you handle skill challenges doesn't make any difference to what I'm talking about. My whole point was that when 4e came out, I wanted to play completely by the book for a change. So that's what my group tried, and it didn't work because the rules were broken.</p><p></p><p>Also, you seem to think that all my PCs are doing is saying "I'll try a Diplomacy check. [rolls dice] Is an 18 high enough?". That's not what's going on. There needs to be roleplaying on top of the roll-playing. But, the "by the book" mechanics still need a check, no matter how well the PC roleplayed the situation. Sure, good roleplaying can be rewarded by a bonus to a check, or by a reroll, but if the player needs to roll a 19 just to pass the DC on a "level appropriate challenge" then the rules are broken.</p><p></p><p>The errata is also broken, for the opposite reason.</p><p></p><p>Yes, skill challenges can be handled differently then the "by the book" method. That's what I now do, because the by the book method didn't work.</p><p></p><p>Finally, I don't think you understand what "teaching someone to suck eggs" means. It means that you shouldn't offer advise on a subject to someone that is an expert in that subject. By saying "Sorry if I'm trying to teach you to suck eggs" you are saying that you're sorry to offer advise to me on a subject that I am an expert in. But then you go on to offer me a whole boatload of advise, so.....what?</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.usingenglish.com/reference/idioms/teach+your+grandmother+to+suck+eggs.html" target="_blank">Teach your grandmother to suck eggs - Idiom Definition - UsingEnglish.com</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Verision, post: 5228590, member: 72236"] I honestly have no idea what your point is. My problem was that I wanted to play by the rules and the rules didn't work. By the rules, in a skill challenge, you need to get X number of successful skill checks before Y number of failed checks. My PCs were failing checks, even though they were rolling well, because the DCs were too high. Then the errata came out and I had the opposite problem; skill challenges weren't challenging because my PCs could roll poorly and still pass the DC. Honestly, how you handle skill challenges doesn't make any difference to what I'm talking about. My whole point was that when 4e came out, I wanted to play completely by the book for a change. So that's what my group tried, and it didn't work because the rules were broken. Also, you seem to think that all my PCs are doing is saying "I'll try a Diplomacy check. [rolls dice] Is an 18 high enough?". That's not what's going on. There needs to be roleplaying on top of the roll-playing. But, the "by the book" mechanics still need a check, no matter how well the PC roleplayed the situation. Sure, good roleplaying can be rewarded by a bonus to a check, or by a reroll, but if the player needs to roll a 19 just to pass the DC on a "level appropriate challenge" then the rules are broken. The errata is also broken, for the opposite reason. Yes, skill challenges can be handled differently then the "by the book" method. That's what I now do, because the by the book method didn't work. Finally, I don't think you understand what "teaching someone to suck eggs" means. It means that you shouldn't offer advise on a subject to someone that is an expert in that subject. By saying "Sorry if I'm trying to teach you to suck eggs" you are saying that you're sorry to offer advise to me on a subject that I am an expert in. But then you go on to offer me a whole boatload of advise, so.....what? [URL="http://www.usingenglish.com/reference/idioms/teach+your+grandmother+to+suck+eggs.html"]Teach your grandmother to suck eggs - Idiom Definition - UsingEnglish.com[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Anyone else out there with rule overload?
Top