Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Anyone else 'seeing' this?...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="steeldragons" data-source="post: 5889347" data-attributes="member: 92511"><p>Yeah, I suppose. The Class Abilities I presented are just a guesstimate of what might be available. It could very well be that the default/simple/basic game would simply state: This class gets these abilities. Done. No choosing necessary. OR it could be that they say this class gets this, singular, class ability with others coming into play/getting chosen as you level up...or every other level...or what have you.</p><p></p><p>The Racial abilities, for the core, I would assume to be the racial tropes we all know (but oddly, not all love). In which case, and based off of multiple "Race" threads supposing about 5e, I would hope the options are available for people to separate the innate/genetic abilities of a race (like vision and ability mod's) and allow options/choice to tack on whatever cultural style abilities they like (your campaign world has/wants some mountain elves? Ok, give them Stonecunning instead of Woodlore, Resistance to Cold instead of Enchantment magic. etc.). In the case of the core/basic game, this would likely be what I put forward as the "standard/default Race X package", iow, "This default race starts with XYZ" and the players wouldn't have to worry about anything beyond that. </p><p></p><p>We've already been told that use of themes and backgrounds will be presented with 3 or 4 abilities (skills and/or feats) built-in...for those that want to use them as such or may be swapped out, or chosen/created whole hog on whim (and DM's discretion) regardless of theme or background. And/or I would expect the game is likely playable without the use of Theme or Background at all if that's how the group decides to play.</p><p></p><p>So, even minimalizing/defaulting the Class and Race components and taking the BG's and Themes as written, there will still be, again I guesstimate, 6-8 additional skills and "feats" for a starting, level 1, PC through their BG and Theme.</p><p></p><p>Again, its a question of the level of modularity you want...which it sounds like 5e is being designed to accommodate. A group could just go "default/as presented" all across the board and be sated with their possibilities. OR a group could customize across Class/Race/Background/Theme (or choose for some and not others) as desired...which obviously would make for a more complex game and diverse characters (more possible combo's of abilities) out of the gate. </p><p> </p><p>--SD</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="steeldragons, post: 5889347, member: 92511"] Yeah, I suppose. The Class Abilities I presented are just a guesstimate of what might be available. It could very well be that the default/simple/basic game would simply state: This class gets these abilities. Done. No choosing necessary. OR it could be that they say this class gets this, singular, class ability with others coming into play/getting chosen as you level up...or every other level...or what have you. The Racial abilities, for the core, I would assume to be the racial tropes we all know (but oddly, not all love). In which case, and based off of multiple "Race" threads supposing about 5e, I would hope the options are available for people to separate the innate/genetic abilities of a race (like vision and ability mod's) and allow options/choice to tack on whatever cultural style abilities they like (your campaign world has/wants some mountain elves? Ok, give them Stonecunning instead of Woodlore, Resistance to Cold instead of Enchantment magic. etc.). In the case of the core/basic game, this would likely be what I put forward as the "standard/default Race X package", iow, "This default race starts with XYZ" and the players wouldn't have to worry about anything beyond that. We've already been told that use of themes and backgrounds will be presented with 3 or 4 abilities (skills and/or feats) built-in...for those that want to use them as such or may be swapped out, or chosen/created whole hog on whim (and DM's discretion) regardless of theme or background. And/or I would expect the game is likely playable without the use of Theme or Background at all if that's how the group decides to play. So, even minimalizing/defaulting the Class and Race components and taking the BG's and Themes as written, there will still be, again I guesstimate, 6-8 additional skills and "feats" for a starting, level 1, PC through their BG and Theme. Again, its a question of the level of modularity you want...which it sounds like 5e is being designed to accommodate. A group could just go "default/as presented" all across the board and be sated with their possibilities. OR a group could customize across Class/Race/Background/Theme (or choose for some and not others) as desired...which obviously would make for a more complex game and diverse characters (more possible combo's of abilities) out of the gate. --SD [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Anyone else 'seeing' this?...
Top