Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Anyone else think 4th Ed is to combat WoW?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="outsider" data-source="post: 3712385" data-attributes="member: 54690"><p>What's so bad about these abilities? They are definitely WoW-like(at least the knight is, I don't recall how the other things listed work). However, saying they are bad simply because they are like WoW isn't rational. A good mechanic is a good mechanic wherever it comes from, as is a bad one. Source isn't all that relevant.</p><p></p><p>I really miss my D&D playing days. I haven't had a good group to play with in years. WoW is one of many games that I've used to fill that void, and I think that D&D could definitely make alot of improvements by emulating certain aspects of WoW. Playing a fighter or rogue in WoW is alot more fun than it is in D&D, for example.</p><p></p><p>Rogues are something I'm fairly familiar with in both systems. In D&D, for the most part, a rogue tries to move into a flanking position and do a sneak attack. He does that every single round. If he has hide in plain sight(or some other sneak enabler), he does that every round. A WoW rogue has a wide assortment of abilities and attacks at his disposal, each with different benefits and drawbacks. Combat for a D&D rogue looks like this:</p><p>Flank, sneak attack, flank, sneak attack, flank, sneak attack, flank, sneak attack, flank, sneak attack, flank, sneak attack, flank, sneak attack, flank, sneak attack, flank, sneak attack, flank, sneak attack, continuing like this for the entire lifetime of the character.</p><p></p><p>Combat for a WoW rogue looks like this:</p><p>Cheap shot, mutilate, kidney shot, cold blood, mutilate, eviscerate(if it will kill the opponent) otherwise gouge(or blind), stealth, cheap shot, mutilate, eviscerate. This is just my default combat routine. I still have many other attacks available that I could use if the above chain is suboptimal for some reason, not to mention a wide variety of defenses and other non attack abilities.</p><p></p><p>To me, combat as a WoW rogue is infinitely more fun than combat as a D&D rogue, and I don't see how anybody could argue otherwise. Spellcasters have had the "different ability every round" playstyle since the beginning(via spellcasting), but for some reason non casters have basically been stuck with "I attack the monster with my sword". This needs to change, drastically. 3rd(and 3.5) took a step in the right direction with feats. However, you pretty much had to devote all your feats to a single style of fighting in order to be effective with it. So, instead of "I attack the monster with my sword" every round, you are instead stuck with "I trip the monster with my spiked chain" every round. Book of 9 Swords was pretty much exactly what melee characters needed, and I really hope that 4th ed follows that trend(though obviously they need to flavor it more appropriately).</p><p></p><p>I'm also looking forward to officially supported online play. It'd be nice to have a group to play with again. Hopefully they come up with some good tools for finding a group, as I find that to be a weakness to the various current methods of playing D&D online.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="outsider, post: 3712385, member: 54690"] What's so bad about these abilities? They are definitely WoW-like(at least the knight is, I don't recall how the other things listed work). However, saying they are bad simply because they are like WoW isn't rational. A good mechanic is a good mechanic wherever it comes from, as is a bad one. Source isn't all that relevant. I really miss my D&D playing days. I haven't had a good group to play with in years. WoW is one of many games that I've used to fill that void, and I think that D&D could definitely make alot of improvements by emulating certain aspects of WoW. Playing a fighter or rogue in WoW is alot more fun than it is in D&D, for example. Rogues are something I'm fairly familiar with in both systems. In D&D, for the most part, a rogue tries to move into a flanking position and do a sneak attack. He does that every single round. If he has hide in plain sight(or some other sneak enabler), he does that every round. A WoW rogue has a wide assortment of abilities and attacks at his disposal, each with different benefits and drawbacks. Combat for a D&D rogue looks like this: Flank, sneak attack, flank, sneak attack, flank, sneak attack, flank, sneak attack, flank, sneak attack, flank, sneak attack, flank, sneak attack, flank, sneak attack, flank, sneak attack, flank, sneak attack, continuing like this for the entire lifetime of the character. Combat for a WoW rogue looks like this: Cheap shot, mutilate, kidney shot, cold blood, mutilate, eviscerate(if it will kill the opponent) otherwise gouge(or blind), stealth, cheap shot, mutilate, eviscerate. This is just my default combat routine. I still have many other attacks available that I could use if the above chain is suboptimal for some reason, not to mention a wide variety of defenses and other non attack abilities. To me, combat as a WoW rogue is infinitely more fun than combat as a D&D rogue, and I don't see how anybody could argue otherwise. Spellcasters have had the "different ability every round" playstyle since the beginning(via spellcasting), but for some reason non casters have basically been stuck with "I attack the monster with my sword". This needs to change, drastically. 3rd(and 3.5) took a step in the right direction with feats. However, you pretty much had to devote all your feats to a single style of fighting in order to be effective with it. So, instead of "I attack the monster with my sword" every round, you are instead stuck with "I trip the monster with my spiked chain" every round. Book of 9 Swords was pretty much exactly what melee characters needed, and I really hope that 4th ed follows that trend(though obviously they need to flavor it more appropriately). I'm also looking forward to officially supported online play. It'd be nice to have a group to play with again. Hopefully they come up with some good tools for finding a group, as I find that to be a weakness to the various current methods of playing D&D online. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Anyone else think 4th Ed is to combat WoW?
Top