Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Anyone else think the Bard concept is just silly?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="The Crimson Binome" data-source="post: 7083617" data-attributes="member: 6775031"><p>I'm not a particular fan of clerics, no. As soon as you put divine magic into a setting, then you have suddenly established as a fact that the gods definitely exist, which means faith can't possibly be a thing and the entire world is significantly changed.</p><p></p><p>It's the same thing with bards. Once you establish that bards are magic, <em>and</em> that their magic is different than the magic of wizards or clerics, then you've raised the bar on how fantastic the world is. Again. You've moved it further away from reality, and made it that much harder to take things seriously.</p><p></p><p>Different people have different thresholds for how high of a fantasy they can tolerate. Most people can accept wizards, because they're traditional. Many people are okay with clerics, because they've been around for so long, though it's not uncommon to see a setting where clerics use the same type of magic as wizards and simply choose to learn different spells. A significant number of people think that clerics and the gods cross the line.</p><p></p><p>Of the people who accept wizards <em>and</em> clerics, as different things that <em>both</em> exist within the same setting, not all of them are willing to suspend disbelief even further to <em>also</em> accommodate bards. Or druids. Or warlocks. Or psychics. Or incarnum-wielders. Or whatever <em>else</em> you want to pour on top of the setting. No matter what you want to add, there's going to be <em>someone</em> who thinks that crosses the line.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="The Crimson Binome, post: 7083617, member: 6775031"] I'm not a particular fan of clerics, no. As soon as you put divine magic into a setting, then you have suddenly established as a fact that the gods definitely exist, which means faith can't possibly be a thing and the entire world is significantly changed. It's the same thing with bards. Once you establish that bards are magic, [I]and[/I] that their magic is different than the magic of wizards or clerics, then you've raised the bar on how fantastic the world is. Again. You've moved it further away from reality, and made it that much harder to take things seriously. Different people have different thresholds for how high of a fantasy they can tolerate. Most people can accept wizards, because they're traditional. Many people are okay with clerics, because they've been around for so long, though it's not uncommon to see a setting where clerics use the same type of magic as wizards and simply choose to learn different spells. A significant number of people think that clerics and the gods cross the line. Of the people who accept wizards [I]and[/I] clerics, as different things that [I]both[/I] exist within the same setting, not all of them are willing to suspend disbelief even further to [I]also[/I] accommodate bards. Or druids. Or warlocks. Or psychics. Or incarnum-wielders. Or whatever [I]else[/I] you want to pour on top of the setting. No matter what you want to add, there's going to be [I]someone[/I] who thinks that crosses the line. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Anyone else think the Bard concept is just silly?
Top