Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Anyone else think the Bard concept is just silly?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Alexemplar" data-source="post: 7090952" data-attributes="member: 6874182"><p>Then he doesn't do it through raw force of personality, but it's very often that kind of character who knows all the legends and lore about monsters, their likes/dislikes, their languages</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p> I have to disagree here. Having a larger than life/forceful/inspiring/intimidating/charming personality is VERY MUCH a part of the Captain/Warlord/Battleleader archetype. </p><p></p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p> I'm saying that if Bards don't NEED the instrument- as others have suggested- then there's no real reason to have them gain automatic proficiency with one or insist they be proficient in one or constantly show them with one. If it doesn't define Bards and they work just fine without, then how is its absence considered a loss that destroys the class' identity?</p><p></p><p> If the minstrel flavor is optional in the Bard class, what is the issue with a Bard class in which minstrel flavor is presented as optional?</p><p></p><p> I say it's because of the identity the Bard has in D&D. One that has been cultivated and not changed too much for decades: the insistence that all Bards- that all oral lorekeepers, jacks of all trades, and pretty much the only dedicated support class- need to be musically themed and carry around instruments (usually a stringed one) and the two concepts are more or less inseparable. </p><p></p><p> D&D *COULD* do what other games have done and separate the two concepts. I doubt it will. Why? The Bard has name recognition. It has history in D&D. There are generations of players who grew up playing the Bard in every edition. There are people who are familiar with the D&D Bard throughout the years and don't want it to change into something that they no longer recognize as the uniquely D&D take on the concept. Too a far lesser extent, there are people who fear that some new class might somehow still the spotlight/role of this D&D fixture. </p><p></p><p> I consider that a tradition.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Alexemplar, post: 7090952, member: 6874182"] Then he doesn't do it through raw force of personality, but it's very often that kind of character who knows all the legends and lore about monsters, their likes/dislikes, their languages I have to disagree here. Having a larger than life/forceful/inspiring/intimidating/charming personality is VERY MUCH a part of the Captain/Warlord/Battleleader archetype. I'm saying that if Bards don't NEED the instrument- as others have suggested- then there's no real reason to have them gain automatic proficiency with one or insist they be proficient in one or constantly show them with one. If it doesn't define Bards and they work just fine without, then how is its absence considered a loss that destroys the class' identity? If the minstrel flavor is optional in the Bard class, what is the issue with a Bard class in which minstrel flavor is presented as optional? I say it's because of the identity the Bard has in D&D. One that has been cultivated and not changed too much for decades: the insistence that all Bards- that all oral lorekeepers, jacks of all trades, and pretty much the only dedicated support class- need to be musically themed and carry around instruments (usually a stringed one) and the two concepts are more or less inseparable. D&D *COULD* do what other games have done and separate the two concepts. I doubt it will. Why? The Bard has name recognition. It has history in D&D. There are generations of players who grew up playing the Bard in every edition. There are people who are familiar with the D&D Bard throughout the years and don't want it to change into something that they no longer recognize as the uniquely D&D take on the concept. Too a far lesser extent, there are people who fear that some new class might somehow still the spotlight/role of this D&D fixture. I consider that a tradition. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Anyone else think the Bard concept is just silly?
Top