Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Rossbert" data-source="post: 7382744" data-attributes="member: 6922357">Completely valid, and maybe not an issue at all. It is just the specter that rises in my brain whenever people want to pull classes closer together. I had the same worries with some of the UA stuff that mixes class features (whatever that wizard with sorcery points was), and the Xanathar bard that uses Battle Master dice.  Good easily be paranoia and to be taken with a healthy dose of salt.I guess my big concern is that light armor and one step lower hit die might not be enough to offset being the skill monkey AND a high level DPS.  The fighter gets high damage and durability but at the cost of having almost nothing else to contribute.  The sorcerer gets good ranged damage, but at the cost of limited uses and almost no durability.It will be a challenge to give the rogue the level of damage asked for in a combat-centered game without unbalancing it with consideration to its general utility.But then some also argue that the paladin has far too high damage in addition to his utility and defense.   Doubly so if a hexblade multi class happens.For full disclosure my current game has that kind of paladin, an assassin rogue, tempest cleric, and a wizard who thinks he is a bard or rogue (bladesinger).  Paladin wrecks face, but the rogue and wizard are really helping with directing that fury and preventing Bad Things (goblin ambushes most recently).  I will keep an eye on the situation as it develops and see if it lends insight.</blockquote>

Verification