Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Cap'n Kobold" data-source="post: 7384157" data-attributes="member: 6802951">You're evidently entitled to your own opinions about 5e, the designers, and the design decisions made. And ENWorld gives you a platform to air those. And those who read your title and original post are free to look at the language and tone used, judge the post, and you yourself by the metric of your previous posts, and render their own opinions.That their opinions don't seem to jibe with your own agenda is not cause to insult, attempt to insinuate, or assign them ulterior motives.&nbsp;Because a lot of people do not share your opinion that there is an issue there, and it took you till the 5th post on the thread after your OP to actually make some suggestions. Your priority was obviously the points addressed in the OP and people are concentrating on that because that is where your priorities appear to lie.Now myself, and several others are willing to accept that you need help on this issue at your table, and we accept that it is an issue at your table. Thus suggestions have been offered and analysis done on your proposals. Generally altering an entire class because of an issue a single player is having is a rather clumsy way of doing things, and opens up the risk of going haywire when an actual optimiser gets hold of it.Hence why there are a lot of alternative suggestions to help you out as well.&nbsp;Expertise says &quot;Hi!&quot; Cunning Action just just nicks your wallet and scarpers. &nbsp;Alert, Sentinel, Skulker, Medium Armoured and Shield master. Sharpshooter, Crossbow expert. &nbsp;Practise what you preach. Quit trying to make grand sweeping claims about the people responding to your OP and instead look at what they're actually saying.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Cap'n Kobold, post: 7384157, member: 6802951"] You're evidently entitled to your own opinions about 5e, the designers, and the design decisions made. And ENWorld gives you a platform to air those. And those who read your title and original post are free to look at the language and tone used, judge the post, and you yourself by the metric of your previous posts, and render their own opinions. That their opinions don't seem to jibe with your own agenda is not cause to insult, attempt to insinuate, or assign them ulterior motives. Because a lot of people do not share your opinion that there is an issue there, and it took you till the [I]5th post[/I] on the thread after your OP to actually [I]make [/I]some suggestions. Your priority was obviously the points addressed in the OP and people are concentrating on that because that is where your priorities appear to lie. Now myself, and several others are willing to accept that you need help on this issue at your table, and we accept that it [I]is [/I]an issue [I]at your table[/I]. Thus suggestions have been offered and analysis done on your proposals. Generally altering an entire class because of an issue a single player is having is a rather clumsy way of doing things, and opens up the risk of going haywire when an actual optimiser gets hold of it. Hence why there are a lot of alternative suggestions to help you out as well. Expertise says "Hi!" Cunning Action just just nicks your wallet and scarpers. Alert, Sentinel, Skulker, Medium Armoured and Shield master. Sharpshooter, Crossbow expert. Practise what you preach. Quit trying to make grand sweeping claims about the [I]people [/I]responding to your OP and instead look at what they're [I]actually saying[/I]. [/QUOTE]

Verification