Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Anyone else tired of the miserly begrudging Rogue design of 5E?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Oofta" data-source="post: 7384170" data-attributes="member: 6801845"><p>So let's get this straight.</p><p></p><p>Non-rogue characters are doing higher damage per round than most people experience. This is possibly because it's focused on situational, nova damage and definitely because the players in question have used feats and optimized their characters. </p><p></p><p>However, rogues can't take feats such as sharp shooter, sentinel, hide during combat, do anything to get attacks (and sneak attack damage) outside of their turn or do anything to optimize their characters because for the rogue those options are too "byzantine". </p><p></p><p>Suggestions on how to increase the rogues damage such as increasing the sneak attack die to a d8 or d10 (a very simple fix) or give them magic weapons to help out are ignored. The solutions you suggested seem to be more complex.</p><p></p><p>Then 98% of responses say that there's not a problem, that the answer in the title of the thread is a simple "NO". All of those responses get attacked because they don't agree 100% with the OP.</p><p></p><p>But let's talk about (an abbreviated version to bypass some of the bluster) first posts.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I don't see the fighters getting 35 or more damage per round consistently without using limited resources, and rogues have their own tricks if they want.</p><p></p><p>True, rogues don't have burst/nova capability. Unless of course they're an assassin or a trickster rogue.</p><p></p><p>In order for your fighters to be getting sky-high damage, they have to have quite a bit of system mastery as well. What's your point? As far as being a combat-heavy game, it depends on your DM and player. There's another thread where people are posting that combat takes up half or less of game time for many people. I know in my current game, the rogue has been quite useful out of combat. YMMV</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Why take away something only to make people take a feat later on to get it back?</p><p></p><p>It would be easier to just give the +<em>n</em> damage on a sneak attack or change the sneak attack die to d8 or d10. I think it's a pretty huge increase in damage.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You think this is simple? OK ... I don't see a need for it. But depending on your game your just piling on and if you don't have many fights between rests then the rogue is suddenly out-damaging everyone.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>CapnZapp taketh away so that CapnZapp can giveth? I don't see the point. If I want to play a swashbuckler rogue, this becomes a feat tax for no reason.</p><p></p><p>Then throw in a few things like rogues have to be better than everyone at damage, better survivability in melee compared to a bear totem barbarian all while insisting that everyone else is wrong unless they agree with you 100%.</p><p></p><p>I could see some minor tweaks to make a more combat effective rogue here and there depending on type of rogue, but why bother? Anything that doesn't just agree with the mighty Capn is ignored or flamed.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Oofta, post: 7384170, member: 6801845"] So let's get this straight. Non-rogue characters are doing higher damage per round than most people experience. This is possibly because it's focused on situational, nova damage and definitely because the players in question have used feats and optimized their characters. However, rogues can't take feats such as sharp shooter, sentinel, hide during combat, do anything to get attacks (and sneak attack damage) outside of their turn or do anything to optimize their characters because for the rogue those options are too "byzantine". Suggestions on how to increase the rogues damage such as increasing the sneak attack die to a d8 or d10 (a very simple fix) or give them magic weapons to help out are ignored. The solutions you suggested seem to be more complex. Then 98% of responses say that there's not a problem, that the answer in the title of the thread is a simple "NO". All of those responses get attacked because they don't agree 100% with the OP. But let's talk about (an abbreviated version to bypass some of the bluster) first posts. I don't see the fighters getting 35 or more damage per round consistently without using limited resources, and rogues have their own tricks if they want. True, rogues don't have burst/nova capability. Unless of course they're an assassin or a trickster rogue. In order for your fighters to be getting sky-high damage, they have to have quite a bit of system mastery as well. What's your point? As far as being a combat-heavy game, it depends on your DM and player. There's another thread where people are posting that combat takes up half or less of game time for many people. I know in my current game, the rogue has been quite useful out of combat. YMMV Why take away something only to make people take a feat later on to get it back? It would be easier to just give the +[I]n[/I] damage on a sneak attack or change the sneak attack die to d8 or d10. I think it's a pretty huge increase in damage. You think this is simple? OK ... I don't see a need for it. But depending on your game your just piling on and if you don't have many fights between rests then the rogue is suddenly out-damaging everyone. CapnZapp taketh away so that CapnZapp can giveth? I don't see the point. If I want to play a swashbuckler rogue, this becomes a feat tax for no reason. Then throw in a few things like rogues have to be better than everyone at damage, better survivability in melee compared to a bear totem barbarian all while insisting that everyone else is wrong unless they agree with you 100%. I could see some minor tweaks to make a more combat effective rogue here and there depending on type of rogue, but why bother? Anything that doesn't just agree with the mighty Capn is ignored or flamed. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Anyone else tired of the miserly begrudging Rogue design of 5E?
Top