Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Cap'n Kobold" data-source="post: 7391971" data-attributes="member: 6802951">Is the idea to make this a 'Rogue-only' feat, that isn't going to help much if you don't have sneak attack?I might have suggested: (Feel free to pick any of these ideas out to use yourselves.)You no longer need to use a finesse or ranged weapon in order to use Sneak Attack.(I just houseruled this, but it fits as a feat option if you don't.)When you have advantage on the attack roll to attack an opponent, if both rolls would have resulted in a successful hit, you may apply your sneak attack to the damage of the attack. This is not considered a sneak attack for the purposes of the number of times that it can be used per turn.(This is a little more random than flat-out removing the restriction. It also reduces the number of sneak attacks generally happening, but see below. )When you successfully strike an opponent that is also adjacent to an ally of yours with a sneak attack, the next attack that they make deals your sneak attack dice in addition to its normal damage.</blockquote>