Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Ruin Explorer" data-source="post: 4353166" data-attributes="member: 18">Word to that. Frankly, 4E is what I wanted out of 3E (I think I was a bit of a voice in the wilderness in this regard - I was desperately keen to see all the sacred cows that 4E kills killed). Of course having dealt with 3E for eight years, elements of 4E disappoint or underwhelm, but still...Personally I think we could have had a workable hybrid, where casters had a few &quot;at-will&quot; spells and a larger number of &quot;selected&quot; spells, and where non-caster types had various extensive at will or conditional abilities in a vaguely Bo9S style, but I think it would have been extremely hard to balance properly, and probably ended up making it so that casters were always better than non-casters again.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Ruin Explorer, post: 4353166, member: 18"] [COLOR=white] Word to that. Frankly, 4E is what I wanted out of 3E (I think I was a bit of a voice in the wilderness in this regard - I was desperately keen to see all the sacred cows that 4E kills killed). Of course having dealt with 3E for eight years, elements of 4E disappoint or underwhelm, but still... Personally I think we could have had a workable hybrid, where casters had a few "at-will" spells and a larger number of "selected" spells, and where non-caster types had various extensive at will or conditional abilities in a vaguely Bo9S style, but I think it would have been extremely hard to balance properly, and probably ended up making it so that casters were always better than non-casters again.[/color] [/QUOTE]

Verification